2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315250861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, Science and Popular Fiction in the Victorian Fin-de-Siècle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing an analogy between types of texts and types of knowledge productively disrupts hierarchies, opening up critical space to consider the value of popular writing to literary and intellectual history. Philip Erchinger interrogates concepts of genre by approaching Victorian literary and scientific texts as "ways of knowing" that share both the "common medium" of 4 Extended analyses of Allen include Abberley (2018;2020), Morton (2005), Melchiori (2000), Ferguson (2006), Greenslade and Rodgers, eds. (2005), Lightman (2007), Stiles (2011), Pittard (2011), and Cowie (2000.…”
Section: Beth Millsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing an analogy between types of texts and types of knowledge productively disrupts hierarchies, opening up critical space to consider the value of popular writing to literary and intellectual history. Philip Erchinger interrogates concepts of genre by approaching Victorian literary and scientific texts as "ways of knowing" that share both the "common medium" of 4 Extended analyses of Allen include Abberley (2018;2020), Morton (2005), Melchiori (2000), Ferguson (2006), Greenslade and Rodgers, eds. (2005), Lightman (2007), Stiles (2011), Pittard (2011), and Cowie (2000.…”
Section: Beth Millsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2005), Lightman (2007), Stiles (2011), Pittard (2011), and Cowie (2000. On the relationship of Allen's fiction to specific scientific subjects, see, for example, Abberley (2018; 2020), Ferguson (2006), Parrinder (2005, Randolph (2005), Slaugh-Sanford (2012), and Stiles (2011.…”
Section: Beth Millsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with continental linguistics, and seeking to distance itself from the earlier conjectural etymologies of Condillac and Lord Monboddo (Ferguson 2006, p. 21), comparative philology was popularised in the mid-nineteenth century by the lectures of Max Müller. Müller emphasised the new science's two underpinning premises: that language was constituted through sound (an inheritance from Herder's focus on the 'living breath' of language as opposed to the deadened written word, an idea itself dating back to Plato's Cratylus), and that it was organised 3 On the cultural implications of comparative philology, see Dowling (1986) and Ferguson (2006); on the development of philology in parallel to reconstructive sciences such as geology (and in turn their relation to detective fiction), see Frank (2003), particularly 9-18. according to laws independent of individuals and of representation. These principles, argues Dowling, became "twin foci for Victorian anxieties about the new order of language and the subversion of culture that order seemed to portend" (ibid., p. 62).…”
Section: Animal Voices: the Crisis Of Comparative Philologymentioning
confidence: 99%