2018
DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2018.1562029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language proficiency does not modulate executive control in older bilinguals

Abstract: We examined if language proficiency modulates performance in tasks that measure executive control in older Telugu-English bilinguals (n = 50, Mean age = 57.15 years). We administered numerical Stroop task, ANT, DCCS task and stop-signal task that are known to tap into different aspects of executive functioning on healthy ageing Telugu-English bilinguals. Second language (English) proficiency was calculated as a cumulative score that considered both subjective and objective measures of L2 fluency and use. Bilin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is certainly a limitation of this analysis that there are only two studies, both of which were relatively under-powered (see Table 2). However, other literature using the ANT with older bilingual populations have also reported no significant differences (Borsa et al 2018;Mishra et al 2019) in the behavioural measures analyzed here.…”
Section: Middle-aged Adultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…It is certainly a limitation of this analysis that there are only two studies, both of which were relatively under-powered (see Table 2). However, other literature using the ANT with older bilingual populations have also reported no significant differences (Borsa et al 2018;Mishra et al 2019) in the behavioural measures analyzed here.…”
Section: Middle-aged Adultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…According to Luo, Luk and Bialystok (2010), the use of both subjective and objective measures is informative than anyone alone. Following this, we used a cumulative composite score to indicate the language proficiency of bilinguals (McMurray, Samelson, Lee & Tomblin, 2010; Mishra, Padmanabhuni, Bhandari, Viswambaran & Prasad, 2018). Based on the composite score (on L2), participants were categorised into two groups – high-L2 proficient bilinguals ( M = 22.7 years, SD = 2.60) and low-L2 proficient bilinguals ( M = 23 years, SD = 3.64) (see Table 1 for participant characteristics) using a median split.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study tested a group of late unbalanced bilinguals on their performance on a version of ANT and a translation task with a set of L2 words with a wide range of corpus frequency. Most importantly, relative increase in L2 vocabulary proficiency reduced the conflict cost in ANT performance in a within-group study, which makes a substantial contribution to the research in bilingualism effect on the cognitive control functions in young adult unbalanced late bilinguals (Tao et al, 2011;Singh and Mishra, 2013;Poarch et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2015;Vega-Mendoza et al, 2015;Mishra et al, 2018;Xie, 2018;Bonfieni et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%