2016
DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1265280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language policy at times of instability and struggle: the impact of fluctuating will and competing agendas on a Slovene language strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elder highlighted the external factors that can mediate policy impact including the interests and competing agendas of parties involved, as well as power imbalances or unclear communication channels between administering bodies. Savski (2017) provided another example of factors which can influence the impact of language testers in policymaking. He reviewed the contribution of different groups of linguists to the drafting and implementation of a Slovene language policy.…”
Section: Language Testers and Migration Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elder highlighted the external factors that can mediate policy impact including the interests and competing agendas of parties involved, as well as power imbalances or unclear communication channels between administering bodies. Savski (2017) provided another example of factors which can influence the impact of language testers in policymaking. He reviewed the contribution of different groups of linguists to the drafting and implementation of a Slovene language policy.…”
Section: Language Testers and Migration Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savski (2017) provided another example of factors which can influence the impact of language testers in policymaking. He reviewed the contribution of different groups of linguists to the drafting and implementation of a Slovene language policy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such demystification is a form of discursive struggle akin to the conflicts that occur when different ideologies come into contact (e.g. nationalist and neoliberal agendas in language policy, see Savski, 2017), it is also distinct from such debates in that it is the site of potential liberation from hegemony. Namely, by sharing narratives and identifying common experiences, members of discursive communities are able to form alliances and build counter‐ideologies through which broader resistance to unjust social relations may be mobilized.…”
Section: Dialogicality and Racialized Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%