1989
DOI: 10.1017/s0267190500001173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Planning: Corpus Planning

Abstract: Beginning with the framework established by Haugen (1983) as a basis for this review, corpus planning can be defined as those aspects of language planning which are primarily linguistic and hence internal to language. Some of these aspects related to language are: 1) orthographic innovation, including design, harmonization, change of script, and spelling reform; 2) pronunciation; 3) changes in language structure; 4) vocabulary expansion; 5) simplification of registers; 6) style, and 7) the preparation of langu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corpus planning can be deined as those aspects of language planning which are primarily linguistic and, hence, internal to language [15]. Some of the example of these aspects that are related to language planning includes orthographic (the way in which words in a language are spelled) innovation, including design, harmonization, change of script and spelling reform; pronunciation; changes in language structure; vocabulary expansion; simpliication of registers; style and the preparation of language material [15].…”
Section: The Historical-structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Corpus planning can be deined as those aspects of language planning which are primarily linguistic and, hence, internal to language [15]. Some of the example of these aspects that are related to language planning includes orthographic (the way in which words in a language are spelled) innovation, including design, harmonization, change of script and spelling reform; pronunciation; changes in language structure; vocabulary expansion; simpliication of registers; style and the preparation of language material [15].…”
Section: The Historical-structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the example of these aspects that are related to language planning includes orthographic (the way in which words in a language are spelled) innovation, including design, harmonization, change of script and spelling reform; pronunciation; changes in language structure; vocabulary expansion; simpliication of registers; style and the preparation of language material [15]. Whereas status planning is concerned with the environment in which the language is used, for example, which language is the "oicial language" or the "national language" of a country.…”
Section: The Historical-structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Haugen (1983), Corpus Planning is internal to language, i.e., it mainly involves its linguistic aspects. The latter are defined by Baldauf (1989) as: "(1) orthographic innovation, including design, harmonization, change of script, and spelling reform; (2) pronunciation; (3) changes in language structure; (4) vocabulary expansion; (5) simplification of registers; (6) style; and (7) the preparation of language material" (p. 11). Graphization signifies the elaboration, adaptation, and selection of scripts and orthographic forms for a language.…”
Section: Hallyu Language and Corpus Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On an even more sinister note, uninformed and unfeeling prescriptivism in language planning can also lead to a tendency to seek to "reduce all linguistic functions in a polity to one language" (Kaplan 1990:7-8), and to use the need to standardize a language at a national level to meet economic and political goals as an argument to eliminate community languages (Cobarrubias 1983a;Baldauf 1990). Faulty description and prescriptivist purposes have also obscured the fact that languages of wider communication in their early stages of development often exhibit a great deal of tolerance for idiolectal variation and inventiveness.…”
Section: Prescriptivism Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%