2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language nonselective lexical access in bilingual toddlers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
92
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(100 reference statements)
3
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…window of 1800ms). We first ran non-parametric statistics to establish a time window for analysis (Maris & Oostenveld, 2007, Von Holzen & Mani, 2012Tsuji, Mazuka, Cristia & Fikkert, 2013). Once a time window was established, fixation proportions were submitted to a Growth Curve Analysis (GCA: Mirman, Dixon & Magnuson, 2008;Mirman, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…window of 1800ms). We first ran non-parametric statistics to establish a time window for analysis (Maris & Oostenveld, 2007, Von Holzen & Mani, 2012Tsuji, Mazuka, Cristia & Fikkert, 2013). Once a time window was established, fixation proportions were submitted to a Growth Curve Analysis (GCA: Mirman, Dixon & Magnuson, 2008;Mirman, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43] with [44]). Therefore, our data were analysed using a permutation test technique that was originally developed for use with time-course data, such as ERP data, for which it is difficult to know a priori which time regions are relevant and which statistical corrections for multiple comparisons are required ([46]; see [47][48][49] for use with the eye-tracking-while-listening paradigm with children). The first step involved computing the test statistic on the real data for each possible time point (in our case the 20-msec timebins created via Matlab).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent developments within the eye-tracking-while-listening paradigm ( [47][48][49]), we used permutation analysis to analyse the eye-tracking data. This allows us to avoid pre-specifying the analysis windows whilst simultaneously correcting for multiple comparisons (see [46]), and to avoid making assumptions regarding by how much we should offset our data analyses to allow for differences in processing speed-a particular problem when comparing across developmental groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now consensus that the lexica of the two languages are not accessed separately, and a range of phonological, semantic and orthographic similarities can trigger activation of one language when processing words in the other language of a bilingual individual. The phenomenon is not limited to adult bilinguals; evidence of non-selective lexical access has also been found in bilingual children as young as 2 years old (Holzen and Mani 2012). This cross-language lexical activation has been evidenced in a variety of experimental tasks, including, more recently, the technique of Event Related Potentials (henceforth ERPs, Thierry and Wu 2007, see also Wu and Thierry 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%