1983
DOI: 10.1016/0193-3973(83)90023-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language loss in bilingual Chicano children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first strategy consists of conducting longitudinal or semi-longitudinal studies of children like the ones by Anderson (1999), Merino (1983) and Silva-Corvalán Meanwhile, the adult heritage speakers had significant problems with relative clauses as compared with the other three groups. This is an indication of attrition over the lifespan.…”
Section: Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first strategy consists of conducting longitudinal or semi-longitudinal studies of children like the ones by Anderson (1999), Merino (1983) and Silva-Corvalán Meanwhile, the adult heritage speakers had significant problems with relative clauses as compared with the other three groups. This is an indication of attrition over the lifespan.…”
Section: Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least three shorter-term longitudinal studies of Spanish heritage speakers in the United States that we know of, which clearly show that it is possible to document both attrition and incomplete acquisition in these speakers even during childhood. Merino (1983) presents a study of school-age Latino children in California. The children were tested on production and comprehension of early-and late-acquired morphosyntactic properties of Spanish (tense, agreement, gender, subjunctive, relative clause, conditionals).…”
Section: Theory Of Language Attainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an age period when sufficient opportunity for the development of both languages has occurred (except for those most recent arrivals), such that the level of bilingualism attained can be considered to have reached some state of stability. There is mounting evidence of ongoing interaction between the two languages in younger bilinguals (for example, Merino 1983 who assessed bilingual proficiency in kindergarten through fourth graders; Brewer Bomar 198 1, who studied lexical and syntactical interference in four-year-olds; and Kaufman and Aronoff in press, who studied the verbal system in a two-year old), but by adolescence, it is assumed that this process would have stabilized. At this period,furthermore, most subjects still live at home, and they are subject to the influences of the home language environment, a variable that has been determined to be important in Veltman's analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%