Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory - COLT '93 1993
DOI: 10.1145/168304.168320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language learning in dependence on the space of hypotheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for the rest of the paper. A programming system (V i ) i∈N is said to be K-acceptable [11,29] iff for any programming system (U i ) i∈N , there exists a limiting computable function f such that for all i, V f (i) = U i . Here a function f is said to be limiting computable iff there exists a computable function g of two arguments such that, for all i, f (i) = lim t→∞ g(i, t).…”
Section: Definition 2 [20] Fix a Hypothesis Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for the rest of the paper. A programming system (V i ) i∈N is said to be K-acceptable [11,29] iff for any programming system (U i ) i∈N , there exists a limiting computable function f such that for all i, V f (i) = U i . Here a function f is said to be limiting computable iff there exists a computable function g of two arguments such that, for all i, f (i) = lim t→∞ g(i, t).…”
Section: Definition 2 [20] Fix a Hypothesis Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, one often considers the following requirements on the hypothesis space H = (H i ) i∈N (see [29,31]):…”
Section: Learning Indexed Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hypothesis space H and an IIM M identifying C in the limit from text with respect to H. A quite natural and often studied modification of LimTxt r.e. is defined by the model of conservative inference, see [2,13] for this concept in the context of learning recursive languages. M is a conservative IIM for C with respect to H = (A i ) i∈N , if M performs only justified mind changes, i.e., if M , on some text t for some L ∈ C, outputs hypotheses i and later j, then M must have seen some element w / ∈ A i before returning j.…”
Section: Gold-style Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Recently, the combination of these two approaches [11,12] as well as the common features of learners in either model [14,15] have gained interest in the learning theory community. [14,15] contributes a systematic analysis of common features of both approaches, thereby focussing on the identification of formal languages, ranging over indexable classes of recursive languages, as target concepts, see [2,13,19]. Characterising different types of Gold-style language learning in terms of query learning has pointed out correspondences between the two models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of an automatic family over general indexed families [1,24,26] is that the first-order theory of automatic families, as well as of automatic structures in general, is decidable [15,16,22]. Here in the first-order theory, the predicates (relations) and functions (mappings) allowed are automatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%