2019
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
78
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
7
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preexisting knowledge of words and word‐classes may lead L2 learners to employ different strategies than those used in L1—and while such knowledge is not factored into our simulations explicitly, it is implicitly reflected in the nature of the L2 speech being chunked and sequenced by the model. Nevertheless, Simulation 1 revealed remarkable similarities in the L1 Child versus L2 learner chunk inventories in terms of chunk structure (see also McCauley, ), suggesting that knowledge of multiword sequences could still play an important role in the speech of our L2 sample. It may merely be that these sequences are discovered and used in ways that are less closely captured by the CBL model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Preexisting knowledge of words and word‐classes may lead L2 learners to employ different strategies than those used in L1—and while such knowledge is not factored into our simulations explicitly, it is implicitly reflected in the nature of the L2 speech being chunked and sequenced by the model. Nevertheless, Simulation 1 revealed remarkable similarities in the L1 Child versus L2 learner chunk inventories in terms of chunk structure (see also McCauley, ), suggesting that knowledge of multiword sequences could still play an important role in the speech of our L2 sample. It may merely be that these sequences are discovered and used in ways that are less closely captured by the CBL model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In our simulations, L2 chunk inventories were less useful in generalizing to unseen utterances. Nevertheless, L2 and child L1 inventories exhibited similarities in terms of structure: McCauley () shows, using a series of network analyses, that the chunk inventories constructed by the model for L2 and L1 child simulations exhibit similar patterns of connectivity (between chunks) while differing significantly from chunk inventories constructed for L1 adult simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations