2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89533-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Independent Word Spotting in Scanned Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of biologically inspired features formed by a cascade of Gabor descriptors was proposed by van der Zant and Schomaker in [57]. The combination of gradient, structural and concavity features was proposed by Srihari and Ball in [54]. All of these word representations present their strengths and weaknesses and it is hard to argue that a set of features is steadily better than another, although in the latest years a trend toward using gradient-based features can be appreciated [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of biologically inspired features formed by a cascade of Gabor descriptors was proposed by van der Zant and Schomaker in [57]. The combination of gradient, structural and concavity features was proposed by Srihari and Ball in [54]. All of these word representations present their strengths and weaknesses and it is hard to argue that a set of features is steadily better than another, although in the latest years a trend toward using gradient-based features can be appreciated [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On manually segmented word images, the words are retrieved for a given query using the gradient based binary features described in (Zhang et al, 2004). Similar methods are also applied on English and Sanskrit documents in Srihari and Ball, 2008). In (Ball et al, 2006), in order to handle the problems of automatic word segmentation, which is especially prone to error on Arabic documents, a segmentation-free method is proposed as an alternative to the methods that require words to be segmented.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For segmenting historical documents, generally methods that are based on the analysis and classification of the distance relationship of adjacent components are used [22,30,31,36,39,44,53,55,61]. These methods, however, are likely to fail with languages such as Ottoman, Persian, Arabic, etc., in which there are inter-word gaps as well as intraword gaps in a document, and determining which is not easy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTW can tolerate spatial variations unlike other methods such as XOR, Euclidean Distance Mapping, Sum of Squared Differences [47]. Alternative to the methods matching words based on whole images or profile-based features [46], recently other features are also experimented, including word contours [57], gradients [34,50,55,65], shape context descriptors [35], Harris corner detector outputs [51], line segments [12,13], and interest points [7]. In [11,21,49,57], the problem of writing style variations in multi-writer datasets is tackled, but these studies generally require isolated words.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%