2020
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2020.1735990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language dominance predicts cognate effects and metalinguistic awareness in preschool bilinguals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study renews the finding of previous studies on language dominance (Cokely, 2012;Robinson Anthony et al, 2020;Shelton et al, 2017). According to Robinson et al (2020) metalinguistic transfer has been demonstrated to be associated with patterns of language dominance in the same way as studies of lexical processing have been. In a study, researchers discovered that knowledge of grammatical structures and syntactic awareness were transferred from the dominant language to the nondominant language when the dominant language was learned.…”
Section: Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study renews the finding of previous studies on language dominance (Cokely, 2012;Robinson Anthony et al, 2020;Shelton et al, 2017). According to Robinson et al (2020) metalinguistic transfer has been demonstrated to be associated with patterns of language dominance in the same way as studies of lexical processing have been. In a study, researchers discovered that knowledge of grammatical structures and syntactic awareness were transferred from the dominant language to the nondominant language when the dominant language was learned.…”
Section: Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cognate facilitation effects in children have been found both in vocabulary acquisition and in lexical processing. Most vocabulary acquisition studies have found cognate facilitation in the L2 (Bosma et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2012;Comesaña et al, 2012Comesaña et al, , 2019Hancin-Bhatt & Nagy, 1994;Kelley & Kohnert, 2012;Malabonga et al, 2008;Méndez Pérez et al, 2010;Proctor & Mo, 2009;Puimège & Peters, 2019;Robinson Anthony et al, 2020;Tonzar et al, 2009;Valente et al, 2018;Von Holzen et al, 2019) and this effect has been shown to be gradual: the more overlap between the L1 and the L2 word, the easier it is to acquire the new L2 word (Bosma et al, 2019;Valente et al, 2018;Von Holzen et al, 2019). A study with L1 English speakers in an L2 Spanish immersion program, however, showed that cognates can also enhance L1 vocabulary acquisition (Cunningham & Graham, 2000).…”
Section: Cognate Facilitation: Psycholinguistic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, however, the cognate awareness task in which the children were informed about cognate relationships was always administered last, so that the instruction could not influence the results of the vocabulary and reading tasks. Still, when discussing the practical implications of their findings, many researchers suggest that explicit instruction may enhance children's vocabulary acquisition (Arteagoitia & Howard, 2015;Chen et al, 2012;Kelley & Kohnert, 2012;Malabonga et al, 2008;Méndez Pérez et al, 2010;Proctor & Mo, 2009;Ramírez et al, 2013;Robinson Anthony et al, 2020;Tonzar et al, 2009).…”
Section: Cognate Facilitation: Educational Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%