2001
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language differences in verbal short-term memory do not exclusively originate in the process of subvocal rehearsal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with claims from non-word repetition studies that long-term language knowledge supports short-term memory performance (Thorn & Gathercole, 2001). Signing Deaf children have acquired a large repertoire of handshapes and movements that they use in their everyday signs, which allows them to analyse the nonsense signs within a phonological system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These findings are consistent with claims from non-word repetition studies that long-term language knowledge supports short-term memory performance (Thorn & Gathercole, 2001). Signing Deaf children have acquired a large repertoire of handshapes and movements that they use in their everyday signs, which allows them to analyse the nonsense signs within a phonological system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Research on digit-span performance in bilinguals has shown that familiarity with the language plays an important role in digit-span performance, with participants generally achieving higher span scores in their mother tongue than in their non-dominant language(s) (Chincotta & Hoosain, 1995;Chincotta & Underwood, 1997b;Da Costa Pinto, 1991;Thorn & Gathercole, 2001). This is in spite of the fact that digits can be considered to be relatively overlearnt stimuli in any language and are usually among the very first words taught in foreign-language education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible sources of this language-familiarity effect on immediate verbal memory have been intensively examined by Thorn and colleagues (Thorn & Gathercole, 1999, 2001; Thorn et al, 2002), who found that this effect was present in immediate serial-recall tasks even under articulatory suppression, which requires participants to utter taskirrelevant words repeatedly and is assumed to prevent participants from engaging in articulatory rehearsal (Thorn & Gathercole, 2001). They also reported that the effects were present in a probed-recall task, but not in a serial recognition task (Thorn et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One of the most prominent features of the cross-linguistic differences has been found in the language-familiarity effect, a phenomenon in which better immediate memory is displayed in response to linguistic materials that are familiar to participants than to those that are unfamiliar (e.g., Chincotta & Hoosain, 1995;Chincotta & Underwood, 1996da Costa Pinto, 1991;Thorn & Gathercole, 1999, 2001; Thorn, Gathercole, & Frankish, 2002). For example, Thorn and Gathercole (1999) reported that English-speaking children performed better in aural memory-span tasks with English than with French digits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation