1942
DOI: 10.2307/1125855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Development of Children in Two Different Rural Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1944
1944
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worbois (79) has shown that the language development of children in one-room schools is inferior to that of those in consolidated schools. Worbois (79) has shown that the language development of children in one-room schools is inferior to that of those in consolidated schools.…”
Section: Stability Of the Iq And Environmental Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worbois (79) has shown that the language development of children in one-room schools is inferior to that of those in consolidated schools. Worbois (79) has shown that the language development of children in one-room schools is inferior to that of those in consolidated schools.…”
Section: Stability Of the Iq And Environmental Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worbois (85) found that children attend ing consolidated schools showed definite superiority over children attend ing one-room rural schools in the same area. Stalnaker (71) reported that the College Entrance Examination Board's English examination re vealed a definite superiority of the girls over the boys.…”
Section: Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tests may often yield a correct educational or occupational prediction for members of the unskilled or semi‐skilled social strata, not solely because of the presence of some general innate factor, but because of the efficiency of early learning, specifically the learning of forms of language use in special environments. See the work of, Nisbet (1953); Scott and Nisbet (1955: 233–5); Dawe (1942: 200–9); Worbois (1942: 175–80); Kellmer Pringle and Bossio (1958: 142–70); Kellmer Pringle and Tanner (1958: 269–87); Luria and Yudovitch (1959); Vigotsky (1939: 29–54); and Bernstein (1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%