2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, desire, and the ontogenesis of intersubjectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is typical of speech addressed to Josephine across the entire 27 minute transcript from which this segment is taken. It is also consistent with an argument I have made in an earlier publication (Rumsey 2003), based on the overall results of my Ku Waru research and comparative data from other language socialization studies, that the grammatical categories of mood and modality, and especially the imperative, figure more centrally in the ontogenesis of intersubjectivity than do the personal pronouns or any other form of explicit person reference. Though they obviously do not refer to participants in the speech situation (as personal pronouns do), imperatives are also indexical or 'pointing words' in that they presuppose distinct positions associated with speaker and addressee; and, like pronouns, a reversibility of perspectives, in that the use of the imperative conventionally entails that the speaker wants something to happen and wants the addressee to do something to bring it about, so that if that same addressee uses an imperative to the erstwhile speaker, their roles are thereby reversed.…”
Section: The Verbal and Non-verbal In Interactions With A Toddlersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is typical of speech addressed to Josephine across the entire 27 minute transcript from which this segment is taken. It is also consistent with an argument I have made in an earlier publication (Rumsey 2003), based on the overall results of my Ku Waru research and comparative data from other language socialization studies, that the grammatical categories of mood and modality, and especially the imperative, figure more centrally in the ontogenesis of intersubjectivity than do the personal pronouns or any other form of explicit person reference. Though they obviously do not refer to participants in the speech situation (as personal pronouns do), imperatives are also indexical or 'pointing words' in that they presuppose distinct positions associated with speaker and addressee; and, like pronouns, a reversibility of perspectives, in that the use of the imperative conventionally entails that the speaker wants something to happen and wants the addressee to do something to bring it about, so that if that same addressee uses an imperative to the erstwhile speaker, their roles are thereby reversed.…”
Section: The Verbal and Non-verbal In Interactions With A Toddlersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…First: Does interaction as affordance also imply interaction as limit? On the one hand, the multiple semiotic modalities of interaction afford first-, second-, and third-person perspectives, which appear predenotationally in children's "proto-conversations" and then denotationally as person deictics (e.g., I and you) in speech (Rumsey 2003). On the other hand, the complex mediation of interaction by speech suggests that the same semiotic processes that afford ethical order might also constrain it.…”
Section: Book Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stop! (e.g., Ervin‐Tripp 1976; Ervin‐Tripp and Gordon 1986; Clancy 1985; Rumsey 2003; Wootton 1997: chapter 3). In these transcripts, parents and children are shown to be involved in “request sequences” of varying length and complexity.…”
Section: The “Theoretical Attitude” In Talk To and By Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%