2009
DOI: 10.1080/03637750802378799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Convergence and Meaning Divergence: A Meaning Centered Communication Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, is research focusing on processes of linguistic divergence and=or convergence (Giles, Bourhis, & Taylor, 1977). But as Dougherty, Kramer, Klatzke, and Rogers (2009) illustrate, while linguistic convergence has received much theoretical attention (see Bormann, 1996;Pearce & Cronen, 1980), little attention has been paid to the study of linguistic divergence. While the goal of communication often is considered to be an attempt to establish shared (or convergent) meanings, it is equally important to attend to instances where divergence might occur.…”
Section: Theoretical Rationalementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, is research focusing on processes of linguistic divergence and=or convergence (Giles, Bourhis, & Taylor, 1977). But as Dougherty, Kramer, Klatzke, and Rogers (2009) illustrate, while linguistic convergence has received much theoretical attention (see Bormann, 1996;Pearce & Cronen, 1980), little attention has been paid to the study of linguistic divergence. While the goal of communication often is considered to be an attempt to establish shared (or convergent) meanings, it is equally important to attend to instances where divergence might occur.…”
Section: Theoretical Rationalementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Language Convergence-Meaning Divergence Theory (LCMD) (Dougherty et al, 2009) is one such platform that directs attention to these interactions whereby ''meaning systems diverge, while converging on the same set of symbols'' (p. 21). Although research emphasizes the ways individuals create shared meaning through talk, this theory examines how meanings may diverge through talk.…”
Section: Theoretical Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication theory is used as the theoretical entry point for this thesis, defining communication as a constitutive practice (Craig 1999;Carey 2009;Linell 2009;Fiske 2011). This view is typically associated with the interaction paradigm, which acknowledges the interactive and boundless nature of communication and focuses on meaning as a central aspect of communication (McQuail 1985;Heath & Bryant 1992;Dougherty et al 2009;Fiske 2011). The interaction paradigm is understood in contrast to a communication paradigm that conceptualizes communication as a transmission of information that focuses on the transmission of a message from a source to a receiver (Delia 1987;Jensen & Rosengren 1990;Heath & Bryant 1992;Rogers 1997;Carey 2009;Linell 2009Fiske 2011.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning-centered communication theory of Language Convergence/ Meaning Divergence (LC/MD) (Dixon & Dougherty, 2014;Dougherty, Kramer, Klatzke, & Rogers, 2009;Dougherty, Mobley, & Smith, 2010) was used to develop interview questions and guide analysis. The theory of LC/ MD was designed to assist in examining communication of meaning, especially when common meanings might be assumed incorrectly (Dougherty et al, 2009). Furthermore, LC/MD is based in grounded theory, where concentration is placed on participants' own words and meanings.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%