“…Out of O'Connor's narrowed‐down list of loanwords, 12 nouns occur in these texts. These account for nearly 11% of the total noun types attested in the inscriptions, a fairly high concentration (citing Butts, 2016, p. 208),similar to the concentration of Greek loanwords that are nouns in the Syriac Life of John of Tella (10.47%), which has a relatively high concentration of Greek loanwords for a Syriac text, and just less than those found in the Jewish Palestinian Aramaic portion of Genesis Rabbah (13.70%), a text in which the Greek language is highly thematized.…”
Nabataean Aramaic contains a large number of loanwords from Arabic. Together with other evidence, this has been taken as an indication that the Nabataeans used Aramaic as a written language only, while a Pre‐Islamic variety of Arabic was their spoken language. Based on a comprehensive review of the evidence, however, this article concludes that both Arabic and Aramaic were in spoken use in the Nabataean Kingdom and Late Antique Northwest Arabia. Departing from this modified understanding of the linguistic status of Nabataean Aramaic, various features of Pre‐Islamic Arabic are then examined based on the Nabataean evidence: the realisation of the voiceless sibilant /s/, nominal morphology, the reflexes of stem‐final *y, verbal syntax, and the lexicon.
“…Out of O'Connor's narrowed‐down list of loanwords, 12 nouns occur in these texts. These account for nearly 11% of the total noun types attested in the inscriptions, a fairly high concentration (citing Butts, 2016, p. 208),similar to the concentration of Greek loanwords that are nouns in the Syriac Life of John of Tella (10.47%), which has a relatively high concentration of Greek loanwords for a Syriac text, and just less than those found in the Jewish Palestinian Aramaic portion of Genesis Rabbah (13.70%), a text in which the Greek language is highly thematized.…”
Nabataean Aramaic contains a large number of loanwords from Arabic. Together with other evidence, this has been taken as an indication that the Nabataeans used Aramaic as a written language only, while a Pre‐Islamic variety of Arabic was their spoken language. Based on a comprehensive review of the evidence, however, this article concludes that both Arabic and Aramaic were in spoken use in the Nabataean Kingdom and Late Antique Northwest Arabia. Departing from this modified understanding of the linguistic status of Nabataean Aramaic, various features of Pre‐Islamic Arabic are then examined based on the Nabataean evidence: the realisation of the voiceless sibilant /s/, nominal morphology, the reflexes of stem‐final *y, verbal syntax, and the lexicon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
