OVERVIEWPsychology and Cognitive Sciences attempts to lead, organize and contribute to the study of mind and intelligence, including memory, emotions, conceptual development and decision-making. It therefore draws on the fields of psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, mathematics, computer science and linguistics. The primary scope, accordingly, involves human behavior, cognition, emotions, and intelligence. As we move forward with this scope, we have the option to narrow or expand it, based on the evolution of the fields, readers' preferences, and in how much we want to entertain applications of this work. In the latter case, one potential secondary scope is how we apply this science to other areas of science, to training and education paradigms, or even clinical populations -this may occur via rich, contextualized narratives that capitalize on qualitative methodology to generate hypotheses that can be further explored. Natural extensions to this primary scope are bio and health informatics, but perhaps education and training of workforce and the next generation of scientists would be suitable, too. This editorial on the Biopsychosocial Model -an update suggested on it -shows the primary and potential secondary scopes of the Journal.
MODELS, THEORIES AND APPROACHES: THE CASE OF THE BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MODELEngel's article on the Biopsychosocial (BPS) Model in medicine 1 and the followup clinical application of the Model was rooted in the attempt to "educate a truly scientific physician … closer to reality". Its roots summarize a long movement over time related to the Flexner report on standards for medical education and practice.2,3 The Model also attempted to shift clinicians from a purely "Biomedical Model" to one that had more of a systems approach and included contributions from behavioural science, cognitive science, neurobiology, medical sociology and health psychology. 4,5 One of the limitations of the biomedical approach was separation of the mind from the body, with most focus on the latter. Those who posited psychosomatic medicine as an integrative approach linked the psyche (mind) and soma (body), but not in a comprehensive way.The systems theory of biology was used by Engel to move beyond a reductionist approach, in which the hierarchy represents and organized dynamic whole with distinctive properties and characteristics (e.g. cell). The figures depicted a continuum from biosphere to subatomic particle/molecule. The focus, accordingly, was the person and the two-person system (doctor and patient) not the disease. The case example of Mr. G. in a subsequent paper (Engel,