2014
DOI: 10.1177/1464993414521340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language as a middle ground: Using grammatical reading to ‘find’ theory in development practice

Abstract: It has been noted that development literature has overlooked theoretical issues, largely because theory and practice are viewed as separate. This separation is produced in language and can be collapsed. Pin-Fat's grammatical reading offers a way of thinking about development by 'staying on the surface of language'. Debates about naming development practices are not purely semantic; they reveal implicit theoretical understandings of what can and should be accomplished by those practices. grammatical reading all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past few decades, there have been significant changes in methods of research and practice in development toward more contextually relevant studies (Chambers, 1997; Read, 2014; UNDP, 2018). Research and development practices have become more sensitive to how individuals and groups within development communicate, interpret, and construct knowledge as part of sensemaking and in understanding and shaping their lives and social realities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, there have been significant changes in methods of research and practice in development toward more contextually relevant studies (Chambers, 1997; Read, 2014; UNDP, 2018). Research and development practices have become more sensitive to how individuals and groups within development communicate, interpret, and construct knowledge as part of sensemaking and in understanding and shaping their lives and social realities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%