2010
DOI: 10.1037/h0100268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and grammar: A behavioral analysis.

Abstract: While speech-language pathologists (SLPs) accept the behavioral methods of treatment in their professional work, they tend to entertain an inadequate or dismissive view of the behavioral analysis of language and grammar. This may be because SLP' academic study of language consists mostly of linguistic theories that typically misrepresent Skinner's (1957) analysis of verbal behavior. An appreciation of Skinner's analysis would be consistent with the clinicians' use of applied behavioral techniques in treating s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential to improve these practices is well recognized, even within the mainstream. The conceptualization and assessment of language should ideally be based on a similar model from which treatment methods are derived (Baker et al., 2008; Esch et al., 2010; Gross et al., 2013; Hedge, 2010; Marshall, 2010; McNeil & Pratt, 2001), yet significant disconnect remains between conceptualization, assessment, and practice in aphasia (Esch et al., 2010; Hedge, 2010; Tippett et al., 2014). Still, such assessments do have utility, even in a behavioral approach.…”
Section: Non‐behavioral Conceptualization and Assessment Of Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential to improve these practices is well recognized, even within the mainstream. The conceptualization and assessment of language should ideally be based on a similar model from which treatment methods are derived (Baker et al., 2008; Esch et al., 2010; Gross et al., 2013; Hedge, 2010; Marshall, 2010; McNeil & Pratt, 2001), yet significant disconnect remains between conceptualization, assessment, and practice in aphasia (Esch et al., 2010; Hedge, 2010; Tippett et al., 2014). Still, such assessments do have utility, even in a behavioral approach.…”
Section: Non‐behavioral Conceptualization and Assessment Of Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language development screening scale for children aged 1 to 6: this scale is derived from Pocket Guide to Assessment in Speech-Language Pathology, which can be used to identify whether children of different age groups have language development delay and disability [51]. The original scale has different scales for 1 ~ 2 years old, 2 ~ 2.5, and 2.5 ~ 3 years old, 3 ~ 4 years old, 4 ~ 5 years old, 5 ~ 6 years old respectively, each scale including eight questions related to the language skills (for example, "can use 100 or above words").…”
Section: 1testing and Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing movement within the field of speech-language pathology to adopt Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior as the foundation for language assessment and intervention (see www.behavioralspeech.com, and www.baojournal.com/SLP-ABA%20WEBSITE/index.html). The highly regarded author of many speech-language pathology textbooks M. H. Hegde (2010) points out, "While speech-language pathologist's (SLPs) accept the behavioral methods of treatment in their professional work, they tend to entertain an inadequate or dismissive view of the behavioral analysis of language and grammar (p. 90). Hegde goes on to describe the basic elements of Skinner's analysis of language and its many advantages for the practice of speechlanguage pathology.…”
Section: Sundbergmentioning
confidence: 99%