1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(97)00251-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langmuir probe measurements in expanding magnetized argon, nitrogen and hydrogen plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general the built-up of charge due to the current of positive charge carriers during the ramp is exactly balanced by the current of negative charge carriers during the pulse. In case of an Ar-H 2 plasma the dominant positive ion is H 3 + ions 23 and during the pulse free electrons are the dominant charge carriers. In both cases the current is a function of the density of the charge carrier, its respective mobility and the potential difference between plasma and substrate.…”
Section: A Psb Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general the built-up of charge due to the current of positive charge carriers during the ramp is exactly balanced by the current of negative charge carriers during the pulse. In case of an Ar-H 2 plasma the dominant positive ion is H 3 + ions 23 and during the pulse free electrons are the dominant charge carriers. In both cases the current is a function of the density of the charge carrier, its respective mobility and the potential difference between plasma and substrate.…”
Section: A Psb Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that both our experiments and theoretical simulation have a certain degree of uncertainty. For instance, the measured ion density can be off by several tens of percent 26,27 and the secondary electron yield is only an assumed value and in fact changes with the sample voltage ͑for example, continuously during the voltage rise time͒. Nonetheless, the dynamic sheath model can yield some insight on the process and is quite powerful when combined with experimental verification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%