2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langmuir–Blodgett Procedure to Precisely Control the Coverage of Functionalized AFM Cantilevers for SMFS Measurements: Application with Cellulose Nanocrystals

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments with functionalized tips are currently one of the most powerful tools to locally measure adhesion forces via single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) measurements. The main difficulty is to precisely control the attachment of biomolecules to the cantilever. Different chemistry procedures have been developed including the use of spacer molecules. Even if a process works well for small biomolecules such as antibodies, issues remain regarding nanoparticles or larger obje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aspect ratio of the nanocrystalline cellulose is 30, being in the same range as the aspect ratio of hemp and flax fibers (Table ). As the interactions between two surfaces strongly depend on their load contact area, a high coverage of the probes with nanocrystalline cellulose (55.8 ± 2.6%) and a surface of low roughness for the matrices (PP, PP/PP‐g‐MA, and PBS) were chosen to ensure the comparison between each surface. Thus, areas of similar roughness were selected for SMFS measurements to ensure that the interaction between the nanocrystalline cellulose and the section of interest was determined over similar contact areas (roughness parameter R a of PP, PP/PP‐g‐MA, and PBS surfaces was 53.8 nm, 51.8 nm, and 49.1 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The aspect ratio of the nanocrystalline cellulose is 30, being in the same range as the aspect ratio of hemp and flax fibers (Table ). As the interactions between two surfaces strongly depend on their load contact area, a high coverage of the probes with nanocrystalline cellulose (55.8 ± 2.6%) and a surface of low roughness for the matrices (PP, PP/PP‐g‐MA, and PBS) were chosen to ensure the comparison between each surface. Thus, areas of similar roughness were selected for SMFS measurements to ensure that the interaction between the nanocrystalline cellulose and the section of interest was determined over similar contact areas (roughness parameter R a of PP, PP/PP‐g‐MA, and PBS surfaces was 53.8 nm, 51.8 nm, and 49.1 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the adhesion forces between the fibers and the different matrices, single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) measurements were performed using a Multimode‐8 atomic force microscope (Santa Barbara, California). Tip‐less AFM levers were functionalized with nanocrystalline cellulose using a protocol described elsewhere to accurately control the cellulose nanorods density on the lever . Briefly, a Langmuir‐Blodgett procedure was used to deposit the nanocrystalline cellulose extracted from bleached ramie fibers on a tipless AFM lever (NP‐O levers from Bruker Nano, Santa Barbara).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis are valuable tools to crimp the morphological nanostructure of CNCs: the acicular shape of the crystals and their nanosized characteristics . The relationship between CNC nanosizes and mammalian cell interactions are discussed in Section 3.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of Cellulose Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%