1983
DOI: 10.1016/0012-365x(83)90008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langford sequences: perfect and hooked

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He showed that for every length l either a Langford or a hooked Langford sequence of defect d = 2 exists and he conjectured the necessary conditions for their existence. The generalization of the problem for any defect d was partially solved by D a v i e s [26] and B e r m o n d et al [12], and it was completed by S i m p s o n [96].…”
Section: ì óö ñ 214º ([91]) a K-near Skolem Sequence Of Order N Exismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He showed that for every length l either a Langford or a hooked Langford sequence of defect d = 2 exists and he conjectured the necessary conditions for their existence. The generalization of the problem for any defect d was partially solved by D a v i e s [26] and B e r m o n d et al [12], and it was completed by S i m p s o n [96].…”
Section: ì óö ñ 214º ([91]) a K-near Skolem Sequence Of Order N Exismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For t ≡ 0, 1 (mod 4) (respectively t ≡ 2, 3 (mod 4)), we can obtain a (3 tn )-decomposition of S t n by using a Langford sequence (respectively hooked Langford sequence) of order t and defect 5, which exists since t ≥ 9, to partition S t into difference triples (see [90,91]). So we have a (3 tn )-decomposition of S t n , and require a (4 qn , n h )-decomposition of K n − {1, 2, 3, 4, 6}∪S t n .…”
Section: T=1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then add 1 to each element of each of these triples to obtain a partition of {5, . [90,91]), and use it to partition {4, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 137mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1983, Simpson proved sufficient conditions for existence of perfect Langford sequences with the addition of the defect d variable indicating the lower bound of the range of integers to include in the sequence [22]. He also showed necessary and sufficient conditions for the hooked versions of these Langford sequences [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also showed necessary and sufficient conditions for the hooked versions of these Langford sequences [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%