Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2016.1238850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslides investigations from geoinformatics perspective: quality, challenges, and recommendations

Abstract: Understanding and assessing the landslides is immensely important to scientists and policy-makers alike. Remote sensing conventional methods and modelling approaches in geographical information system (GIS) tend to be limited to authentic quality and spatial coverage. This study aims to identify challenges and quality of landslides assessment based on remotely sensed data by the mean of existing works of the literature and practices we attempted in the Zagros and Alborz Mountains in Iran and the red rock shiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the great extent and the complexity of the involved areas, we prevalently operated by exploiting LiDAR data. This procedure is confirmed by several authors who analysed ground surface processes by means of high-resolution DTMs (Glenn et al 2006;Ardizzone et al 2007;Haneberg et al 2009;Tarolli 2014;Pirasteh and Li 2016), also in forested areas (Eeckhaut et al 2007;Razak et al 2013;Chen et al 2014) and for large territories (Eeckhaut et al 2007). We employed a visual analysis methodology combining the highresolution DTM and orthoimages.…”
Section: Landslides Identification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Due to the great extent and the complexity of the involved areas, we prevalently operated by exploiting LiDAR data. This procedure is confirmed by several authors who analysed ground surface processes by means of high-resolution DTMs (Glenn et al 2006;Ardizzone et al 2007;Haneberg et al 2009;Tarolli 2014;Pirasteh and Li 2016), also in forested areas (Eeckhaut et al 2007;Razak et al 2013;Chen et al 2014) and for large territories (Eeckhaut et al 2007). We employed a visual analysis methodology combining the highresolution DTM and orthoimages.…”
Section: Landslides Identification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…satellite imagery and aerial photographs) together with field verification using GPS (Soeters and van Westen, 1996). There are some examples of different methods using RS, lidar, and comparisons of inventory maps (Galli et al, 2008;Pirasteh and Li, 2016). Landslide inventory data, hazard factors, and elements at risk (Fig.…”
Section: Landslide Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TLS data has been accepted as a major data source in recent years, a point cloud acquired by the LiDAR system usually includes unnecessary objects such as vegetation [20]. In this case, an accurate DTM can be generated after removing non-ground object points from the point cloud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%