2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility modeling using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For validation of the ML based models, many criteria could be applied for the validation/ assessment of the performance of the models. In this study, prediction accuracy of the proposed models was assessed by the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPF), sensitivity (SST), kappa (k), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), area under the ROC curve (AUC) [50][51][52]. More specifically, PPV and NPV are the probability of pixels associated with correct classification of landslide and non-landslide, respectively [53].…”
Section: Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For validation of the ML based models, many criteria could be applied for the validation/ assessment of the performance of the models. In this study, prediction accuracy of the proposed models was assessed by the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPF), sensitivity (SST), kappa (k), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), area under the ROC curve (AUC) [50][51][52]. More specifically, PPV and NPV are the probability of pixels associated with correct classification of landslide and non-landslide, respectively [53].…”
Section: Validation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine-learning (ML) techniques have become popular for the spatial prediction of natural hazards like wildfires [22], sinkholes [23], groundwater depletion and flooding [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], droughts [39], earthquakes [40], land subsidence [41], and landslides [42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. ML is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that uses computer algorithms to analyze and forecast information by learning from training data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research shows that bivariate statistical models demonstrated better predictive power than both machine learning and data mining algorithms [23]; this is because machine learning and data mining algorithms are more complex and require an expert to perform accurate simulations. Therefore, bivariate models, which are very simple to run with similar or sometimes superior predictive power, can be used as adequate substitutes.At present, the EBF method is rarely applied for flood analysis, though it has been used for other categories of natural disasters such as landslide susceptibility assessment [21,33,58], and land subsidence [12,59], as well as having been used to predict groundwater potential zones [19,60].The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the possibilities of using the EBF method to generate flood susceptibility maps and to assess the strengths and weaknesses of this method, as EBF has rarely been used for floods but has shown high accuracy in previous studies involving natural hazards mapping. The specific objectives of the current study include, (i) determining the most significant factors in each model, (ii) application of a bivariate statistical model, EBF, to produce new ensemble models, in combination with a statistical model, LR, in order to generate a more accurate flood susceptibility map, (iii) detection of the flood-prone areas within the study region for improved management during flood occurrence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the EBF method is rarely applied for flood analysis, though it has been used for other categories of natural disasters such as landslide susceptibility assessment [21,33,58], and land subsidence [12,59], as well as having been used to predict groundwater potential zones [19,60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%