2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-003-0006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan

Abstract: Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan Abstract A spatial database of 791 landslides is analyzed using GIS to map landslide susceptibility in Tsugawa area of Agano River. Data from six landslide-controlling parameters namely lithology, slope gradient, aspect, elevation, and plan and profile curvatures are coded and inserted into the GIS. Later, an indexbased approach is adopted both to put the various clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
231
0
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
231
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…On the whole, these methods can be summarized into two categories: qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative methods mainly refer to site analysis and overlay analysis of thematic maps (for example, geomorphological and geological characteristics) based on expert experience (Anbalagan and Singh 1996;Ayalew et al 2004). Quantitative methods mainly refer to various statistical analyses (Carrara et al 1991;Tang et al 2011a;Yoshimatsu and Abe 2006;Kamp et al 2008), such as artificial neural network (ANN) (Lee and Evangelista 2006;Yilmaz 2010), support vector machine (SVM) (Yao et al 2008;Yilmaz 2010;Xu et al 2012), Bayesian Network (Song et al 2012) and Logistic Regression (Dong et al 2011;Nefeslioglu et al 2006;Xu et al 2013a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the whole, these methods can be summarized into two categories: qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative methods mainly refer to site analysis and overlay analysis of thematic maps (for example, geomorphological and geological characteristics) based on expert experience (Anbalagan and Singh 1996;Ayalew et al 2004). Quantitative methods mainly refer to various statistical analyses (Carrara et al 1991;Tang et al 2011a;Yoshimatsu and Abe 2006;Kamp et al 2008), such as artificial neural network (ANN) (Lee and Evangelista 2006;Yilmaz 2010), support vector machine (SVM) (Yao et al 2008;Yilmaz 2010;Xu et al 2012), Bayesian Network (Song et al 2012) and Logistic Regression (Dong et al 2011;Nefeslioglu et al 2006;Xu et al 2013a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are several validated studies that indicate that the most critical vulnerability class, normally, occupies between 3.5% and 8.0% of the analyzed basins (Kayastha et al 2013;Bai et al 2009;Ayalew et al 2004;and Akinci et al 2011). …”
Section: -Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five (5) classes (Table 8) of soil susceptibility (very low susceptibility, low susceptibility, medium susceptibility, high susceptibility and very high susceptibility) were generated and used for mapping. This linear combination approach is one of the best known and most commonly used MCDA methods (Malczewski, 1999;Ayalew et al, 2004;Tsangaratos and Rozos, 2013) for susceptibility analysis. The summing ranking-based scores at cell unit provide the level of exposure of the unit area taken into consideration all parameters leading to erosion at this micro-unit while maintaining the variation in the spatial interplay of the parameters at the macro-level.…”
Section: Factor Of Soil Erosion Susceptibility Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%