2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility mapping using an automatic sampling algorithm based on two level random sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the corresponding decision tree model was acquired by training random selection of m attributes from all M decision attributes. Finally, the final classification result of the test dataset samples was determined by voting [22,31,34,35,[38][39][40][41]47].…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then the corresponding decision tree model was acquired by training random selection of m attributes from all M decision attributes. Finally, the final classification result of the test dataset samples was determined by voting [22,31,34,35,[38][39][40][41]47].…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis method is difficult to accurately deal with the multi-source, heterogeneous, dynamic and massive landslide disaster-related data accumulated by long-term landslide disaster investigation [9]. The ML method has strong learning ability and can identify the non-linear relationship between landslide disaster susceptibility and influence factors in the region [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, more and more machine-learning (ML) algorithms have been optimized and applied for landslide susceptibility assessment in different regions. Examples are: Bayesian network (BN) (Song et al, 2012;Pham et al, 2016), Naï ve Bayes (NB) (Tien Bui et al, 2012;Pham et al 2015Pham et al , 2016, artificial neural networks (ANN) (Choi et al, 2012;Zare et al, 2013;Conforti et al, 2014;Pham et al 2015;Xu et al, 2015;Tien Bui et al, 2016;Aditian et al, 2018;zhou et al, 2018), Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Marjanović et al, 2011;Tien Bui et al, 2012;2016;Pourghasemi et al, 2013;Pradhan, 2013;San, 2014;Kavzoglu et al, 2014;Peng et al, 2014;Hong et al 2015;Pham et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2017;Ada and San, 2018;zhou et al, 2018;Aktas and San, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019), Logistic Regression (LR) (Choi et al, 2012;Kavzoglu et al, 2014;Hong et al 2015;Trigila et al, 2015;Pham et al, 2016; Tien Bui et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2017;Sevgen et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019), decision tree (DT) (Tien Tien Bui et al, 2012;Pradhan, 2013;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. Khosravi et al, 2018;Aktas and San, 2019), Random Forest (RF) (Trigila et al, 2015;Youssef et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Ada and San, 2018;Aktas and San, 2019), Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) (Rossi et al, 2010; Murillo-Garcí a and Alcá ntara-Ayala, 2015), SVM-ANN (Xia et al, 2018), SVM-LR (Wang et al, 2019), convolutional neural network (CNN)-SVM, CNN-RF and CNN-LR (Fang et al, 2020). These have all been used to quantitatively predict and assess the susceptibility for landslide in different regions of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%