2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-010-0579-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility mapping on Panaon Island, Philippines using a geographic information system

Abstract: For landslide susceptibility mapping, this study applied, verified and compared the Bayesian probability model, the weights-of-evidence to Panaon Island, Philippines, using a geographic information system. Landslide locations were identified in the study area from the interpretation of aerial photographs and field surveys, and a spatial database was extracted from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) DEM (Digital Elevation Model) imagery, aerial photograph, topographic map, and geological map. The factors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, the logistic regression analysis result in modeling rock-fall susceptibility in the study area was evaluated by calculating the success curve rate (SCR) and the percentage of known rock-falls in the various susceptibility categories. For the verification by the SCR method, the area under the SCR curve (AUC) model was used (e.g., Lee and Sambath 2006;Lee and Pradhan 2006;Oh et al 2009;Pradhan andLee 2009, 2010;Nandi and Shakoor 2009;Pradhan 2010;Oh and Lee 2011). To obtain the SCR, the calculated rock-fall susceptibility index values of all pixels in the study area were ranked in a descending order.…”
Section: Susceptibility Map and Its Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the logistic regression analysis result in modeling rock-fall susceptibility in the study area was evaluated by calculating the success curve rate (SCR) and the percentage of known rock-falls in the various susceptibility categories. For the verification by the SCR method, the area under the SCR curve (AUC) model was used (e.g., Lee and Sambath 2006;Lee and Pradhan 2006;Oh et al 2009;Pradhan andLee 2009, 2010;Nandi and Shakoor 2009;Pradhan 2010;Oh and Lee 2011). To obtain the SCR, the calculated rock-fall susceptibility index values of all pixels in the study area were ranked in a descending order.…”
Section: Susceptibility Map and Its Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is despite the fact that DEMs such as those from SRTM and ASTER are being used as major sources of topographic information for many applications including hydrological analysis and simulations (e.g., Jaranilla-Sanchez et al, 2011;Santillan et al, 2011;Sarmiento et al, 2012;Clutario and David, 2014;Chen and Senarath, 2014), flood modelling and hazard mapping (e.g., Abon et al, 2011;Ignacio and Henry, 2013), geological hazard analysis (e.g., Lagmay et al, 2012), and landslide mapping characterization (e.g., Evans et al, 2006;Oh and Lee, 2011). The quality and accuracy of the DEMs used and their suitability for these applications were not adequately assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the geological hazard, these models have been used to analyze landslide susceptibility mapping in many recent studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In this study, the fuzzy algebra model was used to integrate ground subsidence hazard maps, withthis model being used most frequently in analysis landslide susceptibility mapping [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%