2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility mapping & prediction using Support Vector Machine for Mandakini River Basin, Garhwal Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative approaches, such as frequency ratio (FR) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], logistic regression (LR) [26][27][28][29], statistical index (SI) [23], weight of evidence (WoE) [30], evidential belief function (EBF) [31], information value (IV) [32][33][34], information content model (ICM) [35], certainty factors (CF) [36], multivariate regression (MR) [37], multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) [38][39][40], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [41], and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) [41] are based on strict mathematical rules, regardless of any personal judgement. Artificial intelligence techniques, such as kernel logistic regression (KLR) [27], artificial neural network (ANN) [42][43][44][45], support vector machines (SVM) [46][47][48][49], boosted regression trees (BRT) [12,50], neuro-fuzzy system (NFS) [51,52], naive Bayes (NB) [28], decision tree (DT) [11,[53][54][55], and random forest (RF)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative approaches, such as frequency ratio (FR) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], logistic regression (LR) [26][27][28][29], statistical index (SI) [23], weight of evidence (WoE) [30], evidential belief function (EBF) [31], information value (IV) [32][33][34], information content model (ICM) [35], certainty factors (CF) [36], multivariate regression (MR) [37], multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) [38][39][40], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [41], and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) [41] are based on strict mathematical rules, regardless of any personal judgement. Artificial intelligence techniques, such as kernel logistic regression (KLR) [27], artificial neural network (ANN) [42][43][44][45], support vector machines (SVM) [46][47][48][49], boosted regression trees (BRT) [12,50], neuro-fuzzy system (NFS) [51,52], naive Bayes (NB) [28], decision tree (DT) [11,[53][54][55], and random forest (RF)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Keyport et al [16] analyzed pixel-level and object-level landslide detection methods using high resolution remote sensing images, where major landslides were easy to recognize with a few errors. However, quality of the landslide prediction is strongly dependent on the modelling approach [17], therefore, various data-driven approaches have been considered, including logistic regression [18], neural networks [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], support vector machine (SVM) [18,[26][27][28][29][30][31], relevance vector machine [32], least squares SVM [33,34], decision trees [35][36][37][38][39], logistic model trees [40], random forest [38,41,42], gene expression programming [43]. However, no method or technique is the best for landslide modelling at the regional scale for all regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in most cases, machine learning approaches performed better compared to other conventional analytical and expert opinion based methods (Zhou et al, 2018). For instance, artificial neural network (Chen et al, 2017b;Wang et al, 2019), random forest (Pourghasemi and Rahmati, 2018;Dou et al, 2019), support vector machine (Xu et al, 2012;Kumar et al, 2017), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) (Miloš Marjanovic et al, 2009;Chang et al, 2011), logistic regression (Hong et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2018) 1 Corresponding author and decision tree (Pradhan, 2013) models have been extensively used for analyzing landslide susceptibility and achieved high prediction accuracies. Most of the aforementioned studies confirmed the central role of geological factors (lithology, structure, and weathering), topographical factors (slope, elevation, aspect, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%