Landslide susceptibility assessment in a lesser Himalayan road corridor (India) applying fuzzy AHP technique and earth-observation data

Abstract

The Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor, located in the Lesser Himalayas, experiences several landslides every year, resulting in a considerable amount of damage to roads, assets, and other infrastructure and even loss of lives. During the monsoon season (June-August), the disruption of routes due to landslide resulted in economic losses and barred villagers from accessing critical and essential facilities, thus impacting the livelihood of the communities residing along the road corridor. Hence immediate requirement was to systematically assess the landslide susceptibility for the study area that would support in the preparation of the planning and mitigation goal, both short and long term. The present study adopted the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) method integrated with geospatial technology that may be highly effective for landslide susceptibility assessment in the landslide-prone Lesser Himalayas. The use of validated landslide inventory data and high-resolution remote sensing images for selection and mapping of landslide conditioning factors gratifies the geospatial aspect of local variations across the Kalsi-Chakrata road corridor. For fuzzy AHP model setup, prominent landslide contributing factors viz., slope, aspect, altitude, lithology, proximity to road, fault & drainage, Stream Power Index (SPI), Topographical Wetness Index (TWI), rainfall, land use/land cover (LULC), soil, and seismicity, were mapped and classified into significant classes. The resultant landslide susceptibility map (LSM) shows that about 55% (45.23 km 2) of the study area was categorized as a very high and high landslide susceptibility zone. Of this, about 21% (17.7 km 2) was within very high LSM zone, while 33% (27.5 km 2) fell under high landslide susceptibility categories. Approximately 17.6% (14.5 km 2) areas fall within the moderately susceptible zone, where chances of future landslides may be amplified without periodic observation and prospective study. At the village level, it was observed that Jhutaya village, located nearer foothill of Lesser Himalayas, is most susceptible to landslide followed by Dhaira, Chapanu, and Sairi villages. The fuzzy AHP model shows ARTICLE HISTORY

­­­Discovering research trends of urban geology based on a bibliometric analysis

“…[63][64][65] While for landslide, the related topics are land-use and landslide, 66,67 landslide vulnerability and risk assessment. [68][69][70] Other issues related to seismic evidence for earthquakes are mostly on earthquake hazard cases, situated in Turkey's urban area. [71][72][73][74] Eurasian Plate movement was the most frequently discussed topic in these earthquake hazard cases.…”

Performance Assessment of Event-Based Ensemble Landslide Susceptibility Models in Shihmen Watershed, Taiwan

“…After using the training set to establish a model, the testing set is used to assess the performance of the model. The sample data set commonly contains a 50:50 ratio of landslide and no-landslide samples [9,13,26,27], and the ratio of the training set sample to the testing set sample is typically 70:30 [8,12,13,26,28,29]. Furthermore, when establishing a nonparametric machine learning model, the training set is also used to perform hyperparameter optimization.…”

Risk assessment of geohazards along Cheng-Kun railway using fuzzy AHP incorporated into GIS

“…Therefore, the fuzzy AHP was proposed to replace the crisp numbers obtained from decision-makers' judgements in the original AHP method with the fuzzy numbers or fuzzy sets (Chen et al 2011;Lyu et al 2019). For the fuzzy AHP, it has been widely applied into risk assessment, such as the landslide susceptibility and soil slope stability (Zhang et al 2018;Sur et al 2020), which key process is the collection of experts' judgements to determine the fuzzy numbers. Lyu et al (2020d) proposed a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP by performing a risk assessment, which overcomes the deficiency of traditional pairwise questionnaires (Saaty 1977;Li et al 2013a).…”