2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide mapping from multi-sensor data through improved change detection-based Markov random field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
86
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
86
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding the extent of an existing landslide is difficult using this approach, as a landslide is better represented by a heterogeneous polygon (i.e., a collection of pixels). Detection of landslides activity using image correlation [55,56] and change detection [39,57] are also included in pixel-based methods, but they require a time-series of multi-temporal images.…”
Section: Pixel-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the extent of an existing landslide is difficult using this approach, as a landslide is better represented by a heterogeneous polygon (i.e., a collection of pixels). Detection of landslides activity using image correlation [55,56] and change detection [39,57] are also included in pixel-based methods, but they require a time-series of multi-temporal images.…”
Section: Pixel-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslides frequently damage buildings, communication systems, agriculture, natural vegetation, and the environment, and they are a major cause of fatalities (Froude and Petley, 2018;Petley et al, 2005). A landslide inventory forms the basis for studies of landslide hazard, risk, and prevention studies (Fan et al, 2019;Guzzetti et al, 2012;Marcelino et al, 2009;Moosavi et al, 2014). Critical elements of analysis include their spatial distribution pattern (Duman et al, 2005;Galli et al, 2008;Xu, 2015), their occurrences with respect to landform evolution (Guzzetti et al, 2012;Rosi et al, 2018), and a range of other environment factors (Duman et al, 2005), susceptibility mapping (van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2009), triggering factors (Li et al, 2016), community risk assessment and mitigation (Marcelino et al, 2009), and land use planning and risk management (Colombo et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is very time-consuming and can be subjective [31,32]. Recent advancements in remote-sensing technologies have significantly increased our ability to rapidly map landslides of various sizes, with less in situ surveys or human interaction [33][34][35]. Remote sensing of landslides can be categorized into two groups: pixel-based and object-based image analysis (OBIA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%