2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide identification using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these influencing factors, faults, road, and stream network were represented by polylines, the Euclidean distance to the closest source was used to calculate their potential influence on landslides. The lithology is a categorical variable, and was assigned to be a dummy variable as described in the literature [66]. In this way, 14 dummy variables were used to represent 14 lithologies listed in Section 2.4.2.…”
Section: Input and Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these influencing factors, faults, road, and stream network were represented by polylines, the Euclidean distance to the closest source was used to calculate their potential influence on landslides. The lithology is a categorical variable, and was assigned to be a dummy variable as described in the literature [66]. In this way, 14 dummy variables were used to represent 14 lithologies listed in Section 2.4.2.…”
Section: Input and Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracted from the geological map with the scale 1:200,000, and assigned to14 dummy variables as described in the literature [66].…”
Section: -29 Lithologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques are also getting popular in evaluating and detecting landslides [33,34]. In addition, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technique is growing to investigate landslides, such as landslide susceptibility mapping, characterization, and prediction [35].…”
Section: Landslide Investigation: Recent Trends and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep learning has gained tremendous success in various remotesensing applications due to its capability of unveiling latent representations from raw data [13,31]. Wang et al [32] compared convolutional neural network (CNN) with four machine learning algorithms and the results demonstrated that CNN could achieve a better performance. However, CNN relied on its network structure, parameters settings, and training strategies, which limited its robustness [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%