1990
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(90)90037-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide hazard zoning using the GIS approach—A case study from the Ramganga catchment, Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mapping or delineating areas prone to landsliding is essential for land-use activities and management decision making in hilly or mountainous regions. A landslide hazard map can be constructed by a qualitative combination of maps of site conditions, including geology, topography and geomorphology (Gupta and Joshi, 1989;Anbalagan, 1992), by statistical methods, e.g. discriminant analysis and regression techniques, which correlate landslide occurrence with geologic and geomorphic factors (Rice and Pillsbury, 1982;Lewis and Rice, 1990;Carrara et al, 1991;Mark and Ellen, 1995;Atkinson and Massari, 1998), or by using safety factors from stability analysis (Okimura and Kawatani, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping or delineating areas prone to landsliding is essential for land-use activities and management decision making in hilly or mountainous regions. A landslide hazard map can be constructed by a qualitative combination of maps of site conditions, including geology, topography and geomorphology (Gupta and Joshi, 1989;Anbalagan, 1992), by statistical methods, e.g. discriminant analysis and regression techniques, which correlate landslide occurrence with geologic and geomorphic factors (Rice and Pillsbury, 1982;Lewis and Rice, 1990;Carrara et al, 1991;Mark and Ellen, 1995;Atkinson and Massari, 1998), or by using safety factors from stability analysis (Okimura and Kawatani, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easier to manage and enables the introduction of expert opinion into the analysis with respect with other methods more computationally demanding in processing large data-sets, especially considering the scale of the study. The proposed method is derived from a heuristic 'ranking and rating' index-based approach (Stevenson 1977;Amadesi & Vianello 1978;Romana 1985;Gupta & Joshi 1990;Anbalagan 1992;Gupta & Anbalagan 1997;Budetta et al 2008), modified through a bivariate statistical procedure (Van Westen 1993) for assigning the weights to the factors influencing slope instability. The susceptibility was obtained as polynomial function of predisposing factors, according to the following expression:…”
Section: Susceptibility Modelling and Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows that 8 contours (No. 7,16,17,21,23,25,28,29) represent the areas of low or very low risk of hazard of sliding. Although the risk of landside is lessened due to the spread of low-incline slopes, the seismicity reaches up to 8 points, while rocks are of high hazard of sliding.…”
Section: Figure 5 Landscape and Environmental Risks And Hazards Causmentioning
confidence: 99%