2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide hazard assessment in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan) based on Earth-Observation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SAR sensors have the advantage that they can "see" the land surface during all weather conditions, which is particularly valuable when trying to observe landslide changes during the monsoon season. InSAR techniques have been used to study slow moving landslides (<1-2 cm/year) Tofani et al, 2014;Ambrosi et al, 2018). Time series observation techniques also known as Multi-Temporal InSAR (MT-InSAR) have been developed (Ferretti et al, 2001(Ferretti et al, , 2011Berardino et al, 2002;Hooper et al, 2004;Hooper, 2008) to mitigate unwanted phase contributions by several different sources such as electronic properties of the ground, atmospheric delay, inaccurate orbit, and combined noises (Colesanti and Wasowski, 2006).…”
Section: Landslide Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR sensors have the advantage that they can "see" the land surface during all weather conditions, which is particularly valuable when trying to observe landslide changes during the monsoon season. InSAR techniques have been used to study slow moving landslides (<1-2 cm/year) Tofani et al, 2014;Ambrosi et al, 2018). Time series observation techniques also known as Multi-Temporal InSAR (MT-InSAR) have been developed (Ferretti et al, 2001(Ferretti et al, , 2011Berardino et al, 2002;Hooper et al, 2004;Hooper, 2008) to mitigate unwanted phase contributions by several different sources such as electronic properties of the ground, atmospheric delay, inaccurate orbit, and combined noises (Colesanti and Wasowski, 2006).…”
Section: Landslide Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three outburst floods were simulated along the Marsyangdi using a lake volume of 281,051 m 3 and drainage following a triangle hydrograph with times to peak discharge (Qp) of 5, 10, and 20 min. The lake volume corresponded to a 15-m-high simulated dam on the Marsyangdi River (Section 2.4.1), which produced a lake of comparable length (1.1 km) to that reported by [5] following the 2015 Gorkha earthquake.…”
Section: Outburst Floodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevation models of Himalayan topography are required for investigating a range of earth surface processes, including quantifying landslide and landslide-dammed lake volumes (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5]); glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) assessments (e.g., [6][7][8]); hydraulic modelling (e.g., [9][10][11][12]); hydrological modelling (e.g., [13]; and calculating glacier mass balance and ablation processes (e.g., [14][15][16][17]). Global digital elevation model (DEM) products, such as the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) World 3D DEM (AW3D30), offer near-global land surface coverage at 30 m spatial resolution [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For topographic reference (Bamler and Hartl, 1998;Rosen et al, 2000) a DEM was generated from TanDEM-X acquisitions performed along ascending (24.01.2013) and descending (01.10.2013) orbits combined to reduce problems of areas masked by layover and shadow which affect differently opposite slopes along north-south oriented valleys in mountainous regions. The DEM was produced with a posting of 0.0001 decimal degrees, corresponding to about 10 m. TanDEM-X DEMs produced with the same methodology in the past over Mount Etna in Italy (Wegmüller et al, 2014) and the Chomolhari region in Bhutan (Ambrosi et al, 2018), regions with comparable topography as our study area, were validated against ground control points. In comparison to more than 100 GPS benchmarks over Mount Etna and 10 GPS survey points in the Chomolhari region mean differences of the elevations of 0.6 m and 3.6 m, respectively, and standard deviations of 4.3 m and 2.8 m, respectively, were found.…”
Section: Satellite Sar Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the available data the landslide hazard can be divided in three classes according to mean annual velocities below 2 cm/a, between 2 and 10 cm/a and above 10 cm/a. For regions without DInSAR data the estimation of the movement activity of the landslides is sometimes possible from the geomorphological analysis, but often other criteria, such as similarity of the landslides to other already classified (Ambrosi et al, 2018) or based on slope stability models (Moon and Blackstock, 2004), need to be adopted. With newest satellite missions providing regular acquisitions over longer time periods (e.g.…”
Section: Landslide Hazard Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%