Landslide and Debris Flow-Induced Static and Dynamic Loads on Protective Structures

Mast, Carter M.; Mackenzie‐Helnwein, Peter; Arduino, Pedro; Miller, Gregory R.

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19630-0_43

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Overview Of the Materials Point Methods1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Significant research has focused on applications of this type (e.g., [11,12,17,34,59,61,40]), but much work has also been done in additional areas-pushing the capabilities of the MPM and exploring new applications. These include applications in geotechnical engineering [3,60,66], fracture and material failure [15,19,20,41,44,45,53,55], contact, material interaction, and penetration [6,7,23,24,27,33,38,46,42,64,65], as well as general implementation considerations [5,25,28,29,36,48,50].…”

Section: Overview Of the Materials Point Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitigating kinematic locking in the material point method

Mast

Mackenzie‐Helnwein

Arduino

et al. 2012

Journal of Computational Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Overview Of the Materials Point Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitigating kinematic locking in the material point method

Mast

Mackenzie‐Helnwein

Arduino

et al. 2012

Journal of Computational Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physically based modeling and animation of landslides with MPM

Zhao

Zhang

et al. 2019

Vis Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonconforming Dirichlet boundary conditions in implicit material point method by means of penalty augmentation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many geomechanics applications, material boundaries are subjected to large displacements and deformation. Under these circumstances, the application of boundary conditions using particle methods, such as the material point method (MPM), becomes a challenging task since material boundaries do not coincide with the background mesh. This paper presents a formulation of penalty augmentation to impose nonhomogeneous, nonconforming Dirichlet boundary conditions in implicit MPM. The penalty augmentation is implemented utilizing boundary particles, which can move either according to or independently from the material deformation. Furthermore, releasing contact boundary condition, as well as the capability to accommodate slip boundaries, is introduced in the current work. The accuracy of the proposed method is assessed in both 2D and 3D cases, by convergence analysis reaching the analytical solution and by comparing the results of nonconforming and classical grid-conforming simulations.

show abstract

Landslide and Debris Flow-Induced Static and Dynamic Loads on Protective Structures

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Mitigating kinematic locking in the material point method

Mitigating kinematic locking in the material point method

Physically based modeling and animation of landslides with MPM

Nonconforming Dirichlet boundary conditions in implicit material point method by means of penalty augmentation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About