2017
DOI: 10.1007/13836_2017_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape Genomics: Understanding Relationships Between Environmental Heterogeneity and Genomic Characteristics of Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 274 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscape genomics is an emerging analytical framework that investigates how environmental and spatial processes structure the amount and distribution of neutral and adaptive genetic variation among populations (Balkenhol et al., 2017). Landscape genomics is sometimes conflated with genotype–environment association (GEA) analysis, which includes a wide variety of statistical approaches for identifying candidate adaptive loci that covary with environmental predictors (Rellstab, Gugerli, Eckert, Hancock, & Holderegger, 2015).…”
Section: Improving Downstream Computational Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landscape genomics is an emerging analytical framework that investigates how environmental and spatial processes structure the amount and distribution of neutral and adaptive genetic variation among populations (Balkenhol et al., 2017). Landscape genomics is sometimes conflated with genotype–environment association (GEA) analysis, which includes a wide variety of statistical approaches for identifying candidate adaptive loci that covary with environmental predictors (Rellstab, Gugerli, Eckert, Hancock, & Holderegger, 2015).…”
Section: Improving Downstream Computational Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this introduction to landscape genomics, ConGen participants worked on applications of GEA analysis, currently the most widely used landscape genomic technique (Balkenhol et al., 2017). The reasons for the popularity of GEA analyses are practical: They require no phenotypic data or prior genomic resources, do not require experimental approaches (such as reciprocal transplants) to demonstrate local adaptation, and are often more powerful than differentiation‐based outlier detection methods (De Mita et al., 2013; de Villemereuil, Frichot, Bazin, François, & Gaggiotti, 2014; Forester, Lasky, Wagner, & Urban, 2018; Lotterhos & Whitlock, 2015).…”
Section: Improving Downstream Computational Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[73]; 0.270 in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss [74]). Genotyping by sequencing (GBS) methods such as RAD-seq, however, are becoming feasible for non-model forest tree species [75,76], and may provide more precise estimates of adaptive genetic variation in beech in the future.…”
Section: Potentially Adaptive Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape genomics approaches allow for complementary assessment of how environmental and landscape features influence genetic connectivity (Manel & Holderegger, ), and environmental selection processes (Ahrens et al, ; Balkenhol et al, ). Recent advancements in statistical approaches such as environmental association analyses (EAAs) allow for the correlation between allele frequency and environmental variables to be tested (Coop, Witonsky, Di Rienzo, & Pritchard, ; Frichot, Schoville, Bouchard, & Francois, ; Gunther & Coop, ), and may identify selection on many genes of small effect (Rellstab, Gugerli, Eckert, Hancock, & Holderegger, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%