2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape evolution and deduction of surface deformation in the Soan Dun, NW Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further work on fault related parameters, gradient-length anomaly (GLA) analysis, and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (In-SAR) measurements have been conducted by Kothyari et al (2019a) to understand the landscape evolution and deformation pattern within the Soan dun area of northwest Himalayan front. The analysis of fault parameters suggests that the horizontal shortening of northwest Himalaya is higher than the vertical uplift.…”
Section: Nw Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work on fault related parameters, gradient-length anomaly (GLA) analysis, and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (In-SAR) measurements have been conducted by Kothyari et al (2019a) to understand the landscape evolution and deformation pattern within the Soan dun area of northwest Himalayan front. The analysis of fault parameters suggests that the horizontal shortening of northwest Himalaya is higher than the vertical uplift.…”
Section: Nw Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 The youthfulness and spectacular exposure of Himalayan terrain makes it ideal orogeny to study variety of geological process. 51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58 The Himalayan orogeny and the lithospheric deformation have aggravate dintense research in recent years. 59,60,61,62 The landscape modification in the Himalayan thrust zones is result of tectonics and surface geological processes viz, erosion, weathering, upliftment and frangible lithology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 1905 Kangra ~Mw 8 (Middlemiss, 1910), the 1934 Bihar–Nepal Mw 8.1 (Dunn, Auden, Gosh, & Roy, 1939), the 1950 Assam (now Arunachal) Mw 8.6 (Chen & Molnar, 1990), and the 1897 Shillong (Assam) Mw >8 (Oldham, 1899) (Figure 2). These earthquakes ruptured the Himalayan arc along its strike (Kothyari et al, 2019). Based on the historical seismicity, three major seismic gaps were identified along the Himalayan arc: (a) western seismic gap between the 1555 Kashmir Earthquake and the 1905 Kangra Earthquake; (b) central seismic gap between the 1905 Kangra Earthquake and the 1934 Bihar–Nepal Earthquake; and (c) eastern seismic gap between the 1934 Bihar Earthquake and the 1950 Assam Earthquake (Joshi & Thakur, 2016; Khattri, 1987, 1999; Rajendran & Rajendran, 2005) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 1905 Kangra ~Mw 8 (Middlemiss, 1910), the 1934 Bihar-Nepal Mw 8.1 (Dunn, Auden, Gosh, & Roy, 1939), the 1950 Assam (now Arunachal) Mw 8.6 (Chen & Molnar, 1990), and the 1897 Shillong (Assam) Mw >8 (Oldham, 1899) (Figure 2). These earthquakes ruptured the Himalayan arc along its strike (Kothyari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%