2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape context is more important than wetland buffers for farmland amphibians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As predicted by the theory of population genetics, the isolation of amphibian populations decreases genetic diversity as a result of gene flow impediment, genetic drift, and inbreeding when the effective population size is small (Andersen et al, 2004;Broquet et al, 2010;Rhoads et al, 2017). Several studies have established a negative relationship between gene flow and the resistance of the landscape matrix, which is related to agricultural intensification and the expansion of urbanization (Stevens et al, 2006;Van Buskirk, 2012;Crawford et al, 2016;Sawatzky et al, 2019). The barrier role of highways varies depending on the studied species, the age of the infrastructure, and, probably, the density of tunnels under the roadway.…”
Section: Behavioral Ecology Of Dispersal In Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As predicted by the theory of population genetics, the isolation of amphibian populations decreases genetic diversity as a result of gene flow impediment, genetic drift, and inbreeding when the effective population size is small (Andersen et al, 2004;Broquet et al, 2010;Rhoads et al, 2017). Several studies have established a negative relationship between gene flow and the resistance of the landscape matrix, which is related to agricultural intensification and the expansion of urbanization (Stevens et al, 2006;Van Buskirk, 2012;Crawford et al, 2016;Sawatzky et al, 2019). The barrier role of highways varies depending on the studied species, the age of the infrastructure, and, probably, the density of tunnels under the roadway.…”
Section: Behavioral Ecology Of Dispersal In Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape modification threatens biodiversity worldwide (Maxwell et al 2016), altering ecological parameters of very distinct animals such as invertebrates (Macedo et al 2020), fishes (Edge et al 2017), amphibians (Hansen et al 2019), reptiles (Pulsford et al 2017), birds (Vilet et al 2020) and mammals (Grilo et al 2019). In this regard, amphibians are among the most endangered group of animals (Catenazzi 2015), yet they are very heterogeneous in their responses to landscape modification in terms of severity and spatial extent (Ficetola et al 2009;Sawatzky et al 2019). The distinct ways amphibian species deal with habitat alteration has resulted in co-occurring species having contrasting responses when exposed to the same habitat disturbances (Eigenbrod et al 2008;Ficetola et al 2009;Prado & Rossa-Feres 2014;Nowakowski et al 2016Nowakowski et al , 2018Pulsford et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale of effect may also vary according to the relationship between landscape and species requirements for different processes such as dispersal or reproduction (Miguet et al 2016;Sawatzky et al 2019). When a species is dependent on connections of a given habitat type for dispersal, it may respond to larger-scale effects (Ficetola et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the costsurface or permeability of other habitats in the landscape (e.g., Koen et al 2012) and the availability of habitats necessary for wildlife to meet their full lifecycle needs should also be considered (Bortoleto et al 2016;Gilby et al 2018). As an example, reclamation of wetlands should consider not only whether the surrounding landscape will contribute sufficient water to meet the wetland's water budget (Ketcheson et al 2016), but also whether it provides sufficient adjoining overwintering habitat for amphibians (e.g., Sawatzky et al 2019), riparian and swampland to support beaver (e.g., Scrafford et al 2020), roosting and nesting structures and foraging habitat for wetland-dependent birds (e.g., Anderson and Rooney 2019), and sufficient open water to support breeding waterfowl (e.g.,Holopainen et al 2014) but not to boost their predator populations (e.g., Krapu et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%