2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape composition influences avian colonization of experimentally created snags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, most invertebrate groups were unaffected by major additions or removals of dead wood (Ulyshen and Hanula, 2009a) and some vertebrates (e.g., snakes) appeared to be negatively affected by addition of certain types of dead wood (Owens et al, 2008). In other studies, the horizontal distribution of dead wood -clumped versus evenly spread -had contradictory effects depending on the studied species group (Barton et al, 2011;Kroll et al, 2012). Standing dead Positive values indicate higher mean species richness on plots with added dead wood than on controls; negative values indicate lower mean species richness on plots with added dead wood than on controls.…”
Section: Summary Of Results Of Experimental Studies Of Dead Woodmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that study, most invertebrate groups were unaffected by major additions or removals of dead wood (Ulyshen and Hanula, 2009a) and some vertebrates (e.g., snakes) appeared to be negatively affected by addition of certain types of dead wood (Owens et al, 2008). In other studies, the horizontal distribution of dead wood -clumped versus evenly spread -had contradictory effects depending on the studied species group (Barton et al, 2011;Kroll et al, 2012). Standing dead Positive values indicate higher mean species richness on plots with added dead wood than on controls; negative values indicate lower mean species richness on plots with added dead wood than on controls.…”
Section: Summary Of Results Of Experimental Studies Of Dead Woodmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…On the landscape level, soil conditions were the focus of a few studies (e.g., Cornelissen et al, 2012), but macroclimate was only rarely examined (e.g., Müller et al, 2014). Of the biotic features of dead wood, the amount of dead wood was most frequently manipulated in all climate zones, for example by exposing different numbers of logs (Manning et al, 2013) or by cutting, topping or girdling different numbers of trees (e.g., Kroll et al, 2012;Ulyshen and Hanula, 2009b). Only six or fewer studies manipulated the horizontal distribution of snags (Walter and Maguire, 2005) or logs (Barton et al, 2011) or tree species diversity (Seibold et al, 2014).…”
Section: Overview Of Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unspecified variation could arise from multiple sources, including differences in regional species pools across our study landscape (Cornell & Harrison ; Mittelbach & Schemske ) and differences in landscape configuration and/or composition around experimental blocks (Kroll et al . 2012a, ; Tscharntke et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in situations where cavities are limited or clustered, negative interactions can be more evident (Bull et al, 1997;Walter and Maguire, 2005). For example, Kroll et al (2012) found that the percentage of created snags used for nesting in this study was lower in clumped than dispersed snags. In addition, we note that the territorial nature of cavitynesting birds may have hindered our ability to gather a sufficient sample size to test treatment effects.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 79%