The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10103485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape Change and the Sustainable Development Strategy of Different Types of Ethnic Villages Driven by the Grain for Green Program

Abstract: The Grain for Green Program (GGP) is an important ecological project in China that was implemented to tackle serious soil erosion and forest loss for sustainable development. Investigating landscape change is an efficient way to monitor and assess the implementation of GGP. In this paper, 180 ethnic villages, including 36 Miao and Dong (MD) villages with combined populations of Miao people and Dong people, 65 Dong villages, and 79 Miao villages in Qiandongnan Prefecture were selected to investigate the influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the co-occurrence analysis of key words (Figure 2e and f), it can be seen that the keyword GFGP is usually closely related to keywords such as sustainable development (Wang, Higgitt, et al, 2018) and follow-up industries (Wang, Liu, & Li, 2019). The LP area represented by provinces of Shanxi, Gansu and Shaanxi has become the main background and hotspot area of GFGP research.…”
Section: Research Status On the Gfgpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the co-occurrence analysis of key words (Figure 2e and f), it can be seen that the keyword GFGP is usually closely related to keywords such as sustainable development (Wang, Higgitt, et al, 2018) and follow-up industries (Wang, Liu, & Li, 2019). The LP area represented by provinces of Shanxi, Gansu and Shaanxi has become the main background and hotspot area of GFGP research.…”
Section: Research Status On the Gfgpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of traditional villages on the surrounding land can be measured by establishing a buffer zone [42]. In order to further explore the impact of ethnic villages on various indicators of sustainable development, according to the area and precision of the study area, we set up two buffer zones every 2km with ethnic villages as the center using the MultipleRingBuffer tool and r as the radius (r1 = 2 km, r2 = 4 km) in ArcGIS10.4 software, calculated and compared the values of landscape index, ESV and resistance in the buffer zone from 1995 to 2020 [43][44][45].…”
Section: Buffer Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the establishment of a series of naming systems focusing on the selection and protection of rural cultural heritage by the national and local governments in 2002, there has been a surge of attention and research on characteristic villages in the academic circle. Many scholars have conducted a series of fruitful researches on the FHCVs (Wang et al, 2022;Hu et al, 2021), the TVs (Fu et al, 2021;Su et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2021;, the EVs (Wang et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2022;Sato et al, 2019;Kibe et al, 2022), the CLTVs (Qi et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021), and the specialized villages (Yang et al, 2022). In terms of research content, it mainly falls into the following aspects, such as spatial structure identification (Wu et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2022), spatial differentiation and influencing factors (Gao et al, 2021;Qi et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Gong et al, 2022;Jin et al, 2022), sustainable development (Wang et al, 2018;Randelli et al, 2019;Prevolšek et al, 2020), vitality assessment (Liu et al, 2022), heritage values (Fu et al, 2021), rural cultural heritage tourism (Xu et al, 2021;Sanchez-Martin et al, 2020), and protection strategy and revitalization (Jin et al, 2022;Dai et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have conducted a series of fruitful researches on the FHCVs (Wang et al, 2022;Hu et al, 2021), the TVs (Fu et al, 2021;Su et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2021;, the EVs (Wang et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2022;Sato et al, 2019;Kibe et al, 2022), the CLTVs (Qi et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021), and the specialized villages (Yang et al, 2022). In terms of research content, it mainly falls into the following aspects, such as spatial structure identification (Wu et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2022), spatial differentiation and influencing factors (Gao et al, 2021;Qi et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Gong et al, 2022;Jin et al, 2022), sustainable development (Wang et al, 2018;Randelli et al, 2019;Prevolšek et al, 2020), vitality assessment (Liu et al, 2022), heritage values (Fu et al, 2021), rural cultural heritage tourism (Xu et al, 2021;Sanchez-Martin et al, 2020), and protection strategy and revitalization (Jin et al, 2022;Dai et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2017). Among of them, the analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and its influencing factors has always been the focus and important content of the researchers (Li et al, 2023;Gong et al, 2022;Jin et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2018;Li et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%