2016
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape and Gentrification: The Picturesque and Pastoral in 1980s New York Cinema

Abstract: In this article I discuss 1980s New York cinema through the conceptual lens of landscape, drawing in particular on the interconnected but separate traditions of the pastoral and the picturesque. While the former mode of representing landscape is idealizing (the shepherd/nymph-motif), the latter with its origins in the period of the enclosures of the English countryside tends to aestheticize poverty and dispossession. This distinction can productively be deployed in relation to tensions between glamorization an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such scale concerns post-industrial urban space and its financial commodification. Art is considered complicit in the concealment of existing socio-economic conflicts this commodification requires and in the production of new ones resulting from it, where complicity derives not simply from artists' presence in gentrifying neighbourhoods but rather from the formal, representational, and performative techniques they employ (Andersson, 2017;Harris, 2012). However, since such techniques are also mobilised by the very technocrats and profiteers driving neoliberal urbanisation, artists' proficiency in them is also considered potent for challenging this mobilisation (Hawkins, 2010;Vasudevan, 2007), not least by creating concrete opportunities for its subversion in urban spaces (Barry, 2013, pp.…”
Section: Art and Geopolitics In The Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such scale concerns post-industrial urban space and its financial commodification. Art is considered complicit in the concealment of existing socio-economic conflicts this commodification requires and in the production of new ones resulting from it, where complicity derives not simply from artists' presence in gentrifying neighbourhoods but rather from the formal, representational, and performative techniques they employ (Andersson, 2017;Harris, 2012). However, since such techniques are also mobilised by the very technocrats and profiteers driving neoliberal urbanisation, artists' proficiency in them is also considered potent for challenging this mobilisation (Hawkins, 2010;Vasudevan, 2007), not least by creating concrete opportunities for its subversion in urban spaces (Barry, 2013, pp.…”
Section: Art and Geopolitics In The Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%