2000
DOI: 10.2307/2641236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landscape and Fragment Size Effects on Reproductive Success of Forest-Breeding Birds in Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
69
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, the smallest fragments where a species occurs may have only a single or a few singing males, often without mates. With increasing habitat size, pairing success may increase, but only within a relatively large fragment does one find abundance, pairing success, and nesting success patterns that are typical of large, contiguous habitats (Van Horn et al 1995, Burke andNol 2000). Similarly, the kinds of prospecting behaviors associated with locating the most propitious potential nesting site may necessitate larger areas of contiguous habitat than previously recognized (Sandercock et al 2000, Martin et al 2006T.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentation and Conservationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Often, the smallest fragments where a species occurs may have only a single or a few singing males, often without mates. With increasing habitat size, pairing success may increase, but only within a relatively large fragment does one find abundance, pairing success, and nesting success patterns that are typical of large, contiguous habitats (Van Horn et al 1995, Burke andNol 2000). Similarly, the kinds of prospecting behaviors associated with locating the most propitious potential nesting site may necessitate larger areas of contiguous habitat than previously recognized (Sandercock et al 2000, Martin et al 2006T.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentation and Conservationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Habitat specialists are likely to disperse from reserve areas in times of high regional nesting success to more marginal nesting areas, where they may be exposed to increased predation and competition (Soulé et al 1988, Hinsley et al 1996, Helzer and Jelinski 1999, Rottenborn 1999, Burke and Nol 2000. Thus, further research on bird dispersal and settlement patterns may help to explain the mechanism of spatial structuring in bird communities, especially in urban areas.…”
Section: Speculation: Natal Dispersal Landscape Complementation Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, however, using ED to quantify the amount of edge per unit area in a landscape could be problematic due to the markedly nonlinear response of the metric. Thus, while edge effects have been demonstrated to be one of the most important consequences of fragmentation ͑e.g., Demaynadier and Hunter 1998;Gibbs 1998;Bergin et al 2000;Boulet and Darveau 2000;Burke and Nol 2000;Gehlhausen et al 2000;Mancke and Gavin 2000;Euskirchen et al 2001͒, ED may not be the best way to quantify the effects. Further, recent studies have shown that edge effects are dependent on landscape composition and context ͑e.g., contrast between focal habitat and adjacent patches and amount of like habitat in the vicinity of fragments͒ ͑e.g., Heske et al 2001͒.…”
Section: Parabolic Distributions Along the P Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%