2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landowners’ Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…given that many landowners acknowledged the cross-boundary nature of the invasion problem and adapted their control behaviour to the activities of other landowners, establishment of shared rules or collective action is required to achieve efficient landscape-level IAS control over the long term (see also Graham, 2019;Graham et al, 2019;Hulme, 2020). Our results suggest a favourable social setting for coordinating collective control action: there is a high level of agreement on the harmful effects of conifers among the landowners, and over one third of the landowners already discuss conifer invasion with each other (Graham, 2019;Niemiec et al, 2016Niemiec et al, , 2019Ostrom & Ostrom, 2014).…”
Section: Micro-level Social Factors As Levers For Ias Controlmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…given that many landowners acknowledged the cross-boundary nature of the invasion problem and adapted their control behaviour to the activities of other landowners, establishment of shared rules or collective action is required to achieve efficient landscape-level IAS control over the long term (see also Graham, 2019;Graham et al, 2019;Hulme, 2020). Our results suggest a favourable social setting for coordinating collective control action: there is a high level of agreement on the harmful effects of conifers among the landowners, and over one third of the landowners already discuss conifer invasion with each other (Graham, 2019;Niemiec et al, 2016Niemiec et al, , 2019Ostrom & Ostrom, 2014).…”
Section: Micro-level Social Factors As Levers For Ias Controlmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, successful containment of the spread of an IAS often depends on local community members becoming active participants in eradication efforts as well as the ability of an IAS to spread through the landscape (Hobday et al, 2015;Kueffer, 2017). Therefore, failing to consider social complexity or social-ecological dynamics in IAS management could lead to suboptimal IAS control programs and irreversible environmental changes (Bagavathiannan et al, 2019;Epanchin-Niell et al, 2010;Niemiec et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, one person's actions to control an invader on his/her property may be less effective if his/her neighbors are not also engaging in control measures (Yung et al 2015). Residents, therefore, may lose motivation to engage in control efforts if their neighbors do not also participate; this same de-motivational trend occurs even when residents simply think that their neighbors may not do the same (Epanchin-Niel et al 2010;Graham 2013;Niemiec et al 2016;Niemiec et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ambitious concept targets eradication of introduced mammalian pests, including possums and an array of rodents and mustelids (Russell et al 2015). The policy will require innovative ideas and technologies and a holistic synchronised effort by all landowners across New Zealand (Niemiec et al 2017).…”
Section: Predator Free 2050mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the control methods used on islands or isolated locations cannot be deployed on many parts of the mainland for social and ecological reasons (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment 2011; Niemiec et al 2017), ground-control operators cannot work in hazardous terrain, and for financial reasons, helicopters or fixed-wing aircraft are not used to control pests over small areas. Not surprisingly, areas with low pest numbers are quickly excluded when budgets tighten.…”
Section: Current Status Of Pest Control In New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%