2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93860-6_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landmark Constrained Non-parametric Image Registration with Isotropic Tolerances

Abstract: Abstract. The incorporation of additional user knowledge into a nonrigid registration process is a promising topic in modern registration schemes. The combination of intensity based registration and some interactively chosen landmark pairs is a major approach in this direction. There exist different possibilities to incorporate landmark pairs into a variational non-parametric registration framework. As the interactive localization of point landmarks is always prone to errors, a demand for precise landmark matc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the integration of keypoint information into intensity-based image registration can be accomplished in numerous ways, see e.g. [62], [63]. In all these approaches, keypoint matches serve as additional constraints to the sought deformation, either requiring an exact correspondence [62] or allowing for user-defined tolerances [63].…”
Section: Dense Intensity-driven Registration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the integration of keypoint information into intensity-based image registration can be accomplished in numerous ways, see e.g. [62], [63]. In all these approaches, keypoint matches serve as additional constraints to the sought deformation, either requiring an exact correspondence [62] or allowing for user-defined tolerances [63].…”
Section: Dense Intensity-driven Registration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[62], [63]. In all these approaches, keypoint matches serve as additional constraints to the sought deformation, either requiring an exact correspondence [62] or allowing for user-defined tolerances [63]. The primary use case of these approaches consists in integrating user input, for which an error estimate is available, into the registration process.…”
Section: Dense Intensity-driven Registration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landmarks. Though the use of landmarks has been proven to improve image registration results [6,7], the issue remains that they must be provided with high accuracy for each image and often need to be set manually. We additionally face the problem that we choose to not imply any parametrical representation of our transformation ϕ, which means that we only know the values of our transformation at the grid point positions.…”
Section: Extensions For Frame Interpolation For Facial Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally face the problem that we choose to not imply any parametrical representation of our transformation ϕ, which means that we only know the values of our transformation at the grid point positions. Inspired by [7] where the authors incorporate an individual landmark inaccuracy for each landmark pair, we assume that the landmarks are located at pixel positions (grid points), which avoids the interpolation of the deformation ϕ for subpixel locations. Landmarks allow us to influence the direction of the deformation estimation process.…”
Section: Extensions For Frame Interpolation For Facial Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different hybrid methods, which combine landmarks and image features have been proposed in literature. For example in [14,16,26], the landmarks are treated as additional constraints. The methods require a perfect interpolation of the landmarks resulting in numerical problems during optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%