Landless female peasants living in resettlement residential areas in China have poorer quality of life than males: results from a household study in the Yangtze River Delta region

Abstract

BackgroundUrbanization has accelerated in China, and a large amount of arable land has been transformed into urban land. Moreover, the number of landless peasants has continually increased. Peasants lose not only their land, but also a series of rights and interests related with land. The problems of landless peasants have been long-standing; however, only a few studies have examined their health or quality of life (QOL). This paper assesses the QOL of landless peasants in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, analyzes gender differences, and explores health inequity.MethodsData are derived from household samples in six resettlement residential areas of three cities (Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Yangzhou) in the YRD region (N = 1,500; the effective rate = 82.4%). This study uses the short version of World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) scale to measure the QOL of landless peasants, and performs confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and analyze gender differences in QOL on the basis of CFA.Results and conclusion First , we use Analysis of Variance and Non-parametric Tests to test if the differences of mean value of testing generals have statistical significances. Results shows significant differences occur between the impacts of different genders on the four domains of QOL (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment). The internal reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF scale is good (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.8), and the four domains of QOL are connected with each other. Second , scores in each QOL domain are commonly low, whereas the scores of females are much lower, indicating a poorer QOL than that of males. Third , results of the CFA of the QOL domains and their related observed variables indicate a good model fit. Fourth , results imply that the order of importance of the four domains (psychological health (males = 26.74%, females = 27.17%); social relationships (males = 26.23%, females = 25.35%); environment (males = 25.70%, females = 24.40%); and physical health (males = 21.33%, females = 23.08%)) affecting QOL from high to low is the same for landless male and female peasants, whereas the proportion of importance is different between genders. The results highlight the importance of government intervention to improve the QOL of Chinese landless peasants, ultimately reducing health inequity.

Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Landless Peasants in Relatively Developed Regions: Measurement Using PANAS and SWLS

“…Wu and Qin (2008) reviewed the literature about the identity recognition of landless peasants and summarized influencing factors that include institutional external factors and self-subjective factors of peasant groups. In addition, female landless peasants have low quality of life (QOL) (Liang and Li 2014). Thus, many scholars strove to provide numerous recommendations for the improvement of QOL (Yang et al 2010).…”

Satisfaction With Economic and Social Rights and Quality of Life in a Post-Disaster Zone in China: Evidence From Earthquake-Prone Sichuan

“…25,26 WHOQOL-BREF is the most useful instrument in clinical trials 27 and has been proven to be reliable and valid among the Chinese. 28 The scale contains four domains, namely, physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment, with a total of 26 items. Three of these items are reverse-scored, and 2 are overall questions that pertain to global QOL and health satisfaction.…”

Quantifying the effects of aging and urbanization on major gastrointestinal diseases to guide preventative strategies

“…China has a relatively simple ethnic composition and a large land area, and is presently undergoing rapid urbanization [ 4 – 6 ]. Economic growth has had a profound impact on the health of its citizens and levels of medical care; however, because of an unbalanced economy, there is considerable disparity between regions.…”