2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.j055643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landing Gear Noise Identification Using Phased Array with Experimental and Computational Data

Abstract: In regard to aircraft noise mitigation, this paper focuses on noise emission by a simplified nose landing gear (NLG), whose noise sources are identified by the means of sensor array methods. More precisely, following a former characterization of the aeroacoustics by the NLG via dedicated experiments and computations, the subsequent experimental and numerical noise signals are applied two popular sensor array methods of noise localization, namely, classical beam forming (CBF) and deconvolution approach for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After some tests, a plane, cross-shaped array of virtual microphones, inspired by that used in Bulté & Redonnet [65] on the LAGOON configuration in the "C19 open-jet" conditions has been retained. It is composed of two orthogonal linear arrays of microphones evenly distributed on a distance of 100D w .…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After some tests, a plane, cross-shaped array of virtual microphones, inspired by that used in Bulté & Redonnet [65] on the LAGOON configuration in the "C19 open-jet" conditions has been retained. It is composed of two orthogonal linear arrays of microphones evenly distributed on a distance of 100D w .…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phased microphone array is extensively employed in wind tunnels, which offer a controlled environment for the investigation of scaled models [21][22][23] or aircraft components, [24][25][26] although exact replication of flight conditions is difficult due to factors such as modelling accuracy, high background noise level and discrepancy in the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engine noise and airframe noise are the two main sources of aircraft noise [2]. Turbulence noise contributes considerably to aircraft noise, including engine jet noise [3,4], high-lift device noise [5], and landing gear noise [6].Aeroacoustic prediction is a challenging computational fluid dynamics (CFD) problem because the sound energy is much lower than the flow energy, posing a strong challenge to the numerical method and turbulence model. Two types of computation methods, direct method and hybrid method [7], are commonly used to compute noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engine noise and airframe noise are the two main sources of aircraft noise [2]. Turbulence noise contributes considerably to aircraft noise, including engine jet noise [3,4], high-lift device noise [5], and landing gear noise [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%