2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landform assemblages and sedimentary processes along the Norwegian Channel Ice Stream

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major deglaciation event at around this time is also substantiated by AMS radiocarbon ages of plant remains from cored lacustrine sediments on Jæren, somewhat farther south of the fjord (Knudsen, ). Finally, thick sequences (up to several hundred meters) of glaciomarine sediments around the mouth of Boknafjorden that accumulated before 13.5 cal ka BP (Bøe et al ., ) are consistent with a prolonged period of ice stability during deglaciation (Svendsen et al ., ; Ottesen et al ., ). Thus, we find it plausible that ∼16 ka marks the end of a prolonged halt or re‐advance of the ice front position at the mouth of Boknafjorden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A major deglaciation event at around this time is also substantiated by AMS radiocarbon ages of plant remains from cored lacustrine sediments on Jæren, somewhat farther south of the fjord (Knudsen, ). Finally, thick sequences (up to several hundred meters) of glaciomarine sediments around the mouth of Boknafjorden that accumulated before 13.5 cal ka BP (Bøe et al ., ) are consistent with a prolonged period of ice stability during deglaciation (Svendsen et al ., ; Ottesen et al ., ). Thus, we find it plausible that ∼16 ka marks the end of a prolonged halt or re‐advance of the ice front position at the mouth of Boknafjorden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Wellner et al , ; Nitsche et al , ]. The irregular surface depressions in Figure c bear resemblance to hill‐hole pairs observed in bathymetric data in the Norwegian Channel where they are thought to represent the imprint of sediment slabs that froze onto the glacier sole and were removed/displaced [ Ottesen et al , ]. However, if the surface depressions in Figure c are similarly interpreted as hill‐hole pairs, their estimated volumes are an order of magnitude smaller than those observed in the Norwegian Channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 17. Minch Ice Stream and Hebridean Ice Stream; Bradwell et al, 2007;Bradwell, 2013;Bradwell and Stoker, 2015;Dove et al, 2015;Krabbendam et al, 2016) and Scandanavia (Ottesen et al, 2016). The NSL departed the north Norfolk coast after 22.8-21.5 ka BP, leaving till wedges and arcuate moraine complexes on the seafloor as it migrated northwards (green lines; Dove et al, 2017;Roberts et al, 2018).…”
Section: Subglacial Sediment and Landform Genesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retreat of the NSL based on new and existing radiocarbon and OSL ages from the east coast of the UK and the offshore areas of Durham and Northumberland. The transition from scoured and streamlined bedrock terrain to MSGL has also been used to infer an increase in ice flow velocity as ice passes from hard to soft bedded substrates in other ice stream onset settings such as the Hebridean Ice Stream and Norwegian Channel ice Stream (Dove et al, 2015;Ottesen et al, 2016). New dates from the Durham area and offshore suggest the ice margin became quasi-stable as a large grounding zone wedge developed (W1) at some time around 19.5-19.9 ka.…”
Section: Subglacial Sediment and Landform Genesismentioning
confidence: 99%