2012
DOI: 10.11108/kagis.2012.15.2.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Value Analysis Using Space Syntax and GWR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Crawford (2009), “spatial dependence” refers to the degree of spatial autocorrelation between independently measured values observed in geographical space. On the other hand, “spatial heterogeneity” means having different spatial characteristics in different geographical spaces (Longley and Tobón, 2004; Kim and Jeon, 2012). Spatial lag model (SLM) is a spatial regression model in which spatial autocorrelation exists only in dependent variables (Choi and Byeon, 2016), and only “space dependence” can be considered, while the GWR geographic weighted regression model can solve both spatial effects of dependence and heterogeneity (Kwon and Son, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Crawford (2009), “spatial dependence” refers to the degree of spatial autocorrelation between independently measured values observed in geographical space. On the other hand, “spatial heterogeneity” means having different spatial characteristics in different geographical spaces (Longley and Tobón, 2004; Kim and Jeon, 2012). Spatial lag model (SLM) is a spatial regression model in which spatial autocorrelation exists only in dependent variables (Choi and Byeon, 2016), and only “space dependence” can be considered, while the GWR geographic weighted regression model can solve both spatial effects of dependence and heterogeneity (Kwon and Son, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure to generate the convex map involves taking a given spatial structure and partitioning it into a set of "fewest and fattest" convex spaces. The procedure for generating the convex maps is iterative, starting with the identification of the fattest of the convex spaces and then progressively identifying the next largest one until the entire area is subdivided into a set of convex spaces (Kim, Jun, Cho, & Kim, 2008). As with VGA, convex spaces that are one step away from the root space are at depth 1, those two steps was at depth 2 and so on.…”
Section: Aplication Of Convex Map Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second line of inquiry includes recent work from Kim et al (2008) and Thill et al (2011) which demonstrates the calculation of accessibility measures in buildings by considering human movement. They both use a different methodology, with Kim et al (2008) buttressing up their method with the space syntax theory; while Thill et al (2011) employ a traditional gravity-based model.…”
Section: Analogies and Differences With Accessibility Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They both use a different methodology, with Kim et al (2008) buttressing up their method with the space syntax theory; while Thill et al (2011) employ a traditional gravity-based model. Apart from their incorporation in a three-dimensional built environment, both approaches calculate the accessibility of a single spatial unit with regard to pedestrian movement under non-emergency situations, while in our research, exitability is measured under evacuation scenarios.…”
Section: Analogies and Differences With Accessibility Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%