2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land-use impact on porosity and water retention of soils rich in rock fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have shown that soil organic matter has a significant positive effect on total porosity (Jarvis, Forkman, et al, 2017;Johannes et al, 2017;Meurer et al, 2020,b), whereas only a few studies have investigated the effects of SOM on the VSD. However, experiments have found impacts on a wide range of pore diameters, including both smaller matrix pores and larger mesopores (Fukumasu et al, 2022;Kirchmann & Gerzabek, 1999;Sekucia et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021), which implies an increase in the heterogeneity of the VSD and, therefore, the KL divergence. The strong relationships observed between the model parameters of the PSD and the small pore region of the bimodal model (Figure 8a,b) do suggest that the latter is dominated by textural pore space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that soil organic matter has a significant positive effect on total porosity (Jarvis, Forkman, et al, 2017;Johannes et al, 2017;Meurer et al, 2020,b), whereas only a few studies have investigated the effects of SOM on the VSD. However, experiments have found impacts on a wide range of pore diameters, including both smaller matrix pores and larger mesopores (Fukumasu et al, 2022;Kirchmann & Gerzabek, 1999;Sekucia et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021), which implies an increase in the heterogeneity of the VSD and, therefore, the KL divergence. The strong relationships observed between the model parameters of the PSD and the small pore region of the bimodal model (Figure 8a,b) do suggest that the latter is dominated by textural pore space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care must be taken before generalizing these results to arbitrary conditions, e.g., highly dynamic boundary conditions with sequences of precipitation and higher and lower evaporation rates, which might yield different results due to the occurrence of nonequilibrium water dynamics and hysteresis. For real stony soils, changes in the pore size distribution of the background soil may result from the presence of RFs (Sekucia et al, 2020), with corresponding consequences for the effective SHPs. This influence was reported to be more common in compactible soils with a shrinkage-swelling po-tential (Fiès et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the natural causes mentioned above, management disturbances, such as stone removal, ploughing, and flood irrigation, are also responsible for this phenomenon. (1) Rock fragments could enhance soil moisture (Dai et al, 2022; Lai et al, 2021), which was a critical factor affecting SOC distribution in arid areas (Kosmas et al, 1994; Lai, Zhu, et al, 2022; Sekucia et al, 2020). The farmers removed rock fragments from the soil to reduce wear and tear on cultivation tools in orchards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFC is a dominant control of SOC distribution in mountainous areas (Schiedung et al, 2017; Wang, Liu, et al, 2011; Zhang & Shao, 2014). Rock fragments can affect SOC distribution by altering the physical (Dai et al, 2022; Gargiulo et al, 2016; Lai et al, 2021; Sekucia et al, 2020), chemical (Lv et al, 2019), and biological properties of soil (Lai, Zhu, et al, 2022; Tetegan et al, 2015). First, moderate RFC may facilitate SOC accumulation by improving pore distribution and water retention in soil under drought conditions (Lai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%