Forest Biodiversity: Lessons From History for Conservation 2004
DOI: 10.1079/9780851998022.0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land-use history and forest herb diversity in Tompkins County, New York, USA.

Abstract: A legacy of past agriculture continues to shape many current forests in north-eastern North America and Europe, where the understorey flora of postagricultural stands shows reduced diversity and altered composition for hundreds of years. Effective management of forests recovering from human disturbance requires an understanding of the mechanisms that produce these patterns. Here we discuss forest regeneration on abandoned agricultural land in Tompkins County, New York. USA, in comparison with other regions tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proximate plantations of this study, a minimum of approximately 60 years was needed to accumulate forest species numbers to a level comparable to core forests, a pattern that is consistent with earlier findings from floristic surveys in our study area (Brunet, 2004(Brunet, , 2007b and from similar studies carried out elsewhere (Bossuyt and Hermy, 2000;Honnay et al, 2002;Flinn and Marks, 2004).…”
Section: Dispersal-based Processessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the proximate plantations of this study, a minimum of approximately 60 years was needed to accumulate forest species numbers to a level comparable to core forests, a pattern that is consistent with earlier findings from floristic surveys in our study area (Brunet, 2004(Brunet, , 2007b and from similar studies carried out elsewhere (Bossuyt and Hermy, 2000;Honnay et al, 2002;Flinn and Marks, 2004).…”
Section: Dispersal-based Processessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It should be noted that although she considered the herbaceous understory important in distinguishing the regions, the present classification (as well as those using Braun's published stand data) does not consider it. (However, several studies have documented dramatic changes in the herbaceous understory in second-growth forests, compared with old-growth forests; see Duffy and Meier 1992, Matlack 1994, Bellemare et al 2002, Flinn and Marks 2004.) It is likely, though, that the lack of distinctiveness revealed by the data reflects changes in the abundance of woody species in secondary forests compared with the old-growth forests on which Braun focused.…”
Section: Differences Between the Mapsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, several observations suggest that long-distance movement is achieved in ways other than the presumed dispersal mode. Forest herb species considered to lack long-distance dispersal have colonized successional stands isolated from potential seed sources (Matlack 1994;GrashofBokdam and Geertsema 1998), and variation among species in colonization rate into successional forests is often not directly related to diaspore type (Singleton et al 2001;Verheyen et al 2003;Flinn and Marks 2004). Given the advantages of dispersal, another apparent anomaly is the large number of species considered to have no special seed dispersal morphology, accounting for 20-50% of the plant species in some regions (Willson et al 1990;Willson 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%