2010
DOI: 10.5251/abjna.2010.1.6.1148.1157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land use/cover change detection based on remote sensing data (A case study; Neka Basin)

Abstract: Several regions around the world are currently under rapid, wide-ranging changes of land cover. Satellite remote sensing techniques have proven to be cost efficient in extensive land cover changes. This study illustrates the effect of land use/cover change in Neka river of Iran using topographic maps and multi-temporal remotely sensed data from 1975 to 2001. The Maximum likelihood supervised classification technique was used to extract information from satellite data, and post-classification change detection m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For its part, the PCA evidenced that C2 is closely related to agricultural practices (RA, CP, and IP account for the higher nutrient levels in sites TM, JL, RG, and PA), contributing to high nitrogen (NO 2 and NO 3 ) and phosphorus (O-PO 4 ) inputs. This has been highlighted by various authors [47][48][49][50], who point out that increased nutrient levels in water bodies are directly related to the use of agrochemicals, with higher concentrations during the rainy season as a result of leaching and runoff. This fact evidences the need to implement best management practices to prevent excess nutrient discharges into the river.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For its part, the PCA evidenced that C2 is closely related to agricultural practices (RA, CP, and IP account for the higher nutrient levels in sites TM, JL, RG, and PA), contributing to high nitrogen (NO 2 and NO 3 ) and phosphorus (O-PO 4 ) inputs. This has been highlighted by various authors [47][48][49][50], who point out that increased nutrient levels in water bodies are directly related to the use of agrochemicals, with higher concentrations during the rainy season as a result of leaching and runoff. This fact evidences the need to implement best management practices to prevent excess nutrient discharges into the river.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The zone of the river associated with C3 requires the establishment of wastewater treatment facilities before discharge into the river. In all cases, the studies relating land-use changes at different spatio-temporal scales show that forest clearing or replacement of natural vegetation coverage within a basin leads to the deterioration of water quality [48,49,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a few land use/cover change studies used remotely sensed data from sources with a relatively similar scale [38,39], differences in the scales of the input data were not taken into consideration by many authors that have used satellite images, mainly Landsat images for land use/land cover studies in different parts of the world like in Tanzania [40,41], in Uganda [42,43]; in Ghana [44], in Nepal [45,46], in Kenya [47][48][49] in Nigeria [50][51][52][53], in Zimbabwe [54], in India [55][56][57], in Turkey [58][59][60], in Iran [61,62], and in Bangladesh [63][64][65]. Similarly, differences in the scales of the remotely sensed input data were not considered in most of the land use/cover studies that have been done in Ethiopia [12,[66][67][68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change detection is valuable in many applications related to land use and land cover (LULC) changes detection including cultivation, urban expansion and landscape changes (Hegazy & Kaloop, 2015;Imbernon, 1999;Solaimani et al, 2010). Understanding landscape patterns, changes and interactions between human activities and natural phenomenon are essential for proper land management and decision improvement (Rawat & Kumar, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%