2018
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Land Use Change Detection Using Remote Sensing Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous researches reported a 44%, 36.4%, and 65% rise in cultivated land by [ 91 , 92 ] respectively. When subsistence farming is not supported by modern technology, agricultural yield boosting can be attained by the addition of parcels of land under farming, and this is exactly seen in the current study area [ 90 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. Similarly reported progressive agricultural land increase at different periods from different localities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Previous researches reported a 44%, 36.4%, and 65% rise in cultivated land by [ 91 , 92 ] respectively. When subsistence farming is not supported by modern technology, agricultural yield boosting can be attained by the addition of parcels of land under farming, and this is exactly seen in the current study area [ 90 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. Similarly reported progressive agricultural land increase at different periods from different localities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To detect changes in forest cover over a long time span [37][38][39][40][41], Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (19 June, 1991 and6 June, 2004) and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (25 May, 2017) images were downloaded from the United States Geological Survey website [37]. ArcGIS 10.2 software was used to preprocess (radiometric correction) the images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected ground truth ROI is used to resolve the accuracy of the classifier. The error matrix is the most pervasively used method to determine the classification accuracy (Andualem et al, 2018;Manandhar et al, 2009). Figure 2.…”
Section: Post-classification and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%